benchmark evm message calls

[yihuang]

Description

Showcase the performance issue in #710

---

For contributor use:

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Code follows the module structure standards.
• Wrote unit and integration tests
• Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
• Added relevant godoc comments.
• Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer

---

For admin use:

• Added appropriate labels to PR (ex. WIP, R4R, docs, etc)
• Reviewers assigned
• Squashed all commits, uses message "Merge pull request #XYZ: [title]" (coding standards)

[yihuang]

It breaks many unit tests by changing existing contract, I guess it's better for me to create a new contract.

[yihuang]

It breaks many unit tests by changing existing contract, I guess it's better for me to create a new contract.

done, unit test passes now. @fedekunze

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #717 (2c56398) into main (fd36873) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 20.00%.

❗ Current head 2c56398 differs from pull request most recent head 2006f52. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2006f52 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #717      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.41%   56.38%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          64       64              
  Lines        5637     5642       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         3180     3181       +1     
- Misses       2271     2273       +2     
- Partials      186      188       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
x/evm/types/compiled_contract.go	29.26% <20.00%> (-1.29%)	⬇️