Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

erc20: rename intrarelayer module #173

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 13, 2021
Merged

Conversation

fedekunze
Copy link
Contributor

@fedekunze fedekunze commented Dec 13, 2021

@fedekunze fedekunze marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2021 21:15
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #173 (85a7c5c) into main (d16ca65) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #173   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.61%   72.61%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        1727     1727           
=======================================
  Hits         1254     1254           
  Misses        421      421           
  Partials       52       52           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
x/erc20/keeper/evm.go 72.36% <ø> (ø)
x/erc20/keeper/evm_hooks.go 54.79% <ø> (ø)
x/erc20/keeper/gov_hooks.go 81.13% <ø> (ø)
x/erc20/keeper/grpc_query.go 71.15% <ø> (ø)
x/erc20/keeper/keeper.go 87.50% <ø> (ø)
x/erc20/keeper/migrations.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
x/erc20/keeper/msg_server.go 79.21% <ø> (ø)
x/erc20/keeper/params.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
x/erc20/keeper/token_pairs.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
x/erc20/types/codec.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 11 more

@fedekunze fedekunze merged commit 9f3e9fd into main Dec 13, 2021
@fedekunze fedekunze deleted the fedekunze/intrarelayer-rename branch December 13, 2021 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants