Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

comparison tables for EVM opcodes to ewasm methods and wasm instructions #81

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cdetrio
Copy link
Contributor

@cdetrio cdetrio commented Feb 25, 2018

No description provided.

evm_vs_ewasm_opcode_table.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
evm_vs_ewasm_opcode_table.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
0x3a: GASPRICE | getTxGasPrice
0x3b: EXTCODESIZE | getExternalCodeSize
0x3c: EXTCODECOPY | externalCodeCopy
0x3d: RETURNDATASIZ | getReturnDataSize
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing last letter?

evm_vs_ewasm_opcode_table.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
evm_vs_ewasm_opcode_table.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cdetrio cdetrio force-pushed the opcode-table branch 2 times, most recently from bcc3ca0 to 425cd15 Compare March 1, 2018 01:45
Copy link
Contributor

@jamesray1 jamesray1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, although I am not very confident as I could probably be more familiar with the Wasm and EWasm spec, having not read the latter and not having finished reading the former.

evm_vs_ewasm_opcode_table.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants