Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Patch Status 33617-RISCV_Add_memsetzero_expansion_with_ZicbozZic64b-2 #1495

Closed
github-actions bot opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2024

Precommit CI Run information

Logs can be found in the associated Github Actions run: https://github.com/ewlu/gcc-precommit-ci/actions/runs/8996987805

Patch information

Applied patches: 1 -> 2
Associated series: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=33617
Last patch applied: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20240508053855.1244942-4-christoph.muellner@vrull.eu/
Patch id: 89733

Build Targets

Some targets are built as multilibs. If a build target ends with multilib, please refer to the table below to see all the targets within that multilib.

Target name -march string
newlib-rv64gc-lp64d-multilib rv32gc-ilp32d, rv64gc-lp64d
newlib-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib rv64gcv-lp64d
linux-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib rv32gcv-ilp32d, rv64gcv-lp64d

Target Information

Target Shorthand -march string
Bitmanip gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs

Notes

Testsuite results use a more lenient allowlist to reduce error reporting with flakey tests. Please take a look at the current allowlist.
Results come from a sum file comparator. Each patch is applied to a well known, non-broken baseline taken from our
gcc postcommit framework (here) which runs the full gcc testsuite every 6 hours.
If you have any questions or encounter any issues which may seem like false-positives, please contact us at patchworks-ci@rivosinc.com

Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2024

Lint Status

Lint passed

Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2024

Apply Status

Target Status
Baseline hash: gcc-mirror/gcc@1139f38 Applied
Tip of tree hash: gcc-mirror/gcc@f6ce855 Applied

Notes

Patch applied successfully

Additional information

Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2024

Build GCC Status

Target Status
linux-rv64gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-lp64d-non-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-linux-rv64gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-lp64d-non-multilib-build-log artifact
newlib-rv64gc-lp64d-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-newlib-rv64gc-lp64d-multilib-build-log artifact
linux-rv32gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-ilp32d-non-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-linux-rv32gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-ilp32d-non-multilib-build-log artifact
linux-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-linux-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib-build-log artifact
newlib-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-newlib-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib-build-log artifact

Notes

Patch(es) were applied to the hash gcc-mirror/gcc@1139f38. If this patch commit depends on or conflicts with a recently committed patch, then these results may be outdated.

Additional information

Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2024

Testsuite Status

Summary

Build Failures Additional Info
linux-rv64gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-lp64d-non-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-linux-rv64gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-lp64d-non-multilib-build-log artifact
newlib-rv64gc-lp64d-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-newlib-rv64gc-lp64d-multilib-build-log artifact
linux-rv32gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-ilp32d-non-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-linux-rv32gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-ilp32d-non-multilib-build-log artifact
linux-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-linux-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib-build-log artifact
newlib-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib Build failure. Please check the 89733-newlib-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib-build-log artifact
New Failures gcc g++ gfortran Previous Hash
Resolved Failures gcc g++ gfortran Previous Hash
Unresolved Failures gcc g++ gfortran Previous Hash

Additional information

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants