Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Patch Status 27276-BUGFIX_RISCV_Disallow_COSNTVECTOR_for_DI_on_RV32-1 #759

Closed
github-actions bot opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
Labels
linter-failure Lint failed

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

Precommit CI Run information

Logs can be found in the associated Github Actions run: https://github.com/ewlu/gcc-precommit-ci/actions/runs/6942467770

Patch information

Applied patches: 1 -> 1
Associated series: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=27276
Last patch applied: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20231121100209.315304-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai/
Patch id: 80452

Build Targets

Some targets are built as multilibs. If a build target ends with multilib, please refer to the table below to see all the targets within that multilib.

Target name -march string
newlib-rv64gc-lp64d-multilib rv32gc-ilp32d, rv64gc-lp64d
newlib-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib rv64gcv-lp64d
linux-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib rv32gcv-ilp32d, rv64gcv-lp64d

Target Information

Target Shorthand -march string
Bitmanip gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs

Notes

Testsuite checks are in beta testing stages. Results are unstable and may be inaccurate.

Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented Nov 21, 2023

Lint Status

The following issues have been found with 27276-BUGFIX_RISCV_Disallow_COSNTVECTOR_for_DI_on_RV32-1 using gcc's ./contrib/check_GNU_style.py.
Please use your best judgement when resolving these issues. These are only warnings and do not need to be resolved in order to merge your patch.
If any of these warnings seem like false-positives that could be guarded against please contact me: patchworks-ci@rivosinc.com.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./gcc/contrib/check_GNU_style.py", line 45, in <module>
    main()
  File "./gcc/contrib/check_GNU_style.py", line 42, in main
    with open(filename, newline='\n') as diff_file:
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: './patches/patch-1.patch'

Additional information

Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented Nov 21, 2023

Apply Status

Target Status
Baseline hash: gcc-mirror/gcc@e5e305e Applied
Tip of tree hash: gcc-mirror/gcc@4649c07 Applied

Notes

Patch applied successfully

Additional information

Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented Nov 21, 2023

Build GCC Status

Target Status
linux-rv32gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-ilp32d-non-multilib Success
linux-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib Success
newlib-rv64gcv-lp64d-multilib Success
newlib-rv64gc-lp64d-multilib Success
linux-rv64gc_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs-lp64d-non-multilib Success

Notes

Patch(es) were applied to the hash gcc-mirror/gcc@e5e305e. If this patch commit depends on or conflicts with a recently committed patch, then these results may be outdated.

Additional information

Copy link
Author

github-actions bot commented Nov 21, 2023

Testsuite Status (Beta - Ignore Results)

Summary

New Failures gcc g++ gfortran Previous Hash
Resolved Failures gcc g++ gfortran Previous Hash
Unresolved Failures gcc g++ gfortran Previous Hash
linux: rv32 Bitmanip ilp32d medlow 104/88 39/26 31/6 gcc-mirror/gcc@e5e305e
linux: rv32gcv ilp32d medlow multilib 143/104 47/31 18/6 gcc-mirror/gcc@e5e305e
linux: rv64 Bitmanip lp64d medlow 36/19 15/6 32/6 gcc-mirror/gcc@e5e305e
linux: rv64gcv lp64d medlow multilib 52/35 19/7 16/5 gcc-mirror/gcc@e5e305e
newlib: rv32gc ilp32d medlow multilib 84/26 109/17 0/0 gcc-mirror/gcc@e5e305e
newlib: rv64gc lp64d medlow multilib 73/21 81/12 0/0 gcc-mirror/gcc@e5e305e
newlib: rv64gcv lp64d medlow multilib 82/32 85/13 0/0 gcc-mirror/gcc@e5e305e

Additional information

@github-actions github-actions bot added the linter-failure Lint failed label Nov 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
linter-failure Lint failed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants