1842: New xlsx option for ignoring certain nodes for improved performance

[hofnarwillie]

Summary

This PR is to mitigate the issue described here: #1842
When the xlsx document contains a single dataValidation applied to the entire worksheet (or a very large range) using a cell address like A1:AAA1048000 then the DataValidationsXform.parseClose() function loops through each cell in the range and unless you have a super computer it runs out of memory. In some cases these validations are not relevant to the context in which the file is being parsed, so a simple performance improvement is to skip over specific XLSX nodes (in this case dataValidations).

Some unrelated linting issues were fixed automatically by the husky pre-commit. I've left them in this PR.

Test plan

Included a couple of integration tests and ensured all the other tests still pass. Also updated the README to describe the new option.

Related to source code (for typings update)

Added typescript typings for options passed into workbook.xlsx.readFile() and workbook.xlsx.load(). I have not made any changes to the stream.xslx.* interfaces. Would appreciate some input here from the maintainers of the package as I don't know if it is necessary (i.e. if the stream based implementations will use the same options and parsing techniques).

[aonamrata]

can someone from the maintainers group review this?
@guyonroche , @alubbe or @Siemienik

[Siemienik]

I would like, however currently I'm overloaded

[Siemienik]

Great idea on the topic of performance optimization. Thank you for your contribution! I added some proposals to update Readme and reduce unnecessary if. I hope that's not a problem for you 😄 @hofnarwillie, I appreciate your effort, the tests added, and your code is cool 👍

@skypesky or @zurmokeeper, would you like to update README_zh?

Will it merge on the next MergeFest

This PR was reviewed during the MergeFest session.

[zurmokeeper]

Great idea on the topic of performance optimization. Thank you for your contribution! I added some proposals to update Readme and reduce unnecessary if. I hope that's not a problem for you 😄 @hofnarwillie, I appreciate your effort, the tests added, and your code is cool 👍

@skypesky or @zurmokeeper, would you like to update README_zh?

Will it merge on the next MergeFest

This PR was reviewed during the MergeFest session.

Sure, I'm happy to do that, and after this pr is merged into master, I'll raise a new PR to update README_zh.