Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃悰 FIX: fixing chapters numbering #829

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 30, 2020

Conversation

choldgraf
Copy link
Member

This fixes the numbering for some chapters when we have a top-level file w/ numbered: true

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #829 into master will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #829      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.84%   84.77%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         660      657       -3     
==========================================
- Hits          560      557       -3     
  Misses        100      100              
Flag Coverage 螖
#pytests 84.77% <100.00%> (-0.07%) 猬囷笍

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage 螖
jupyter_book/toc.py 94.44% <100.00%> (-0.11%) 猬囷笍

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
螖 = absolute <relative> (impact), 酶 = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2560360...0156dc2. Read the comment docs.

@choldgraf choldgraf changed the title fixing chapters numbering 馃悰 FIX: fixing chapters numbering Jul 30, 2020
@choldgraf choldgraf merged commit fea781f into executablebooks:master Jul 30, 2020
@choldgraf choldgraf deleted the numberfix branch July 30, 2020 14:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant