-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bank Account problem under wrong concept? #550
Comments
Hello. Thanks for opening an issue on Exercism. We are currently in a phase of our journey where we have paused community contributions to allow us to take a breather and redesign our community model. You can learn more in this blog post. As such, all issues and PRs in this repository are being automatically closed. That doesn't mean we're not interested in your ideas, or that if you're stuck on something we don't want to help. The best place to discuss things is with our community on the Exercism Community Forum. You can use this link to copy this into a new topic there. Note: If this issue has been pre-approved, please link back to this issue on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it. |
Created #551 , but I think we can go ahead and create the concurrency concept. The way I see it, the exercise is essentially about atoms, though I've seen some folks use agents, since they seem to fit the description better. But I'm not sure if it really deals with concurrency, iiuc it just uses swap and reset. |
In the concepts section, the Bank Account problem is under Floating-Point Numbers concpet. The problem doesn't seem to have anything to do with floating points. Perhaps we can create a new concept cateogry for such problems: Concurrency or Advanced or something like that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: