-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Revert time intependent consensus #29
WIP: Revert time intependent consensus #29
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checked this vs previous revision. 5 empty blocks per minute -> 37 empty blocks per minute on default config. (6 validators).
Icebox it for future tests |
@defuz, so, we came to understanding so far that we don't need to revert time handling to initial state, because the issue with empty blocks on multiple (6-8) nodes is easily handled with status_timeout set to a lower value (5 -> 3 sec e.g.). And the performance of 4 nodes shows similar values to the performance of reverted version, though 3 times lower than that, achieved quite before. |
Can we close this pr? @defuz @gisochre |
I agree that this should be closed: because of the conflicts it would be easier to implement it from the scratch (if we ever need this). |
@defuz should we close this as too far behind? |
Closed as outdated |
Added new end-point for outputting wallet(s) info
Improve source and wallets
Move tests to ./tests
New identifiers pool implementation [ECR-2807]
Revert #6 pull request because of degrading performance. In order to preserve #22, some changes are manual and not pure revert-commit.