Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(metro-config): add Exotic support for Expo SDK 47 #20827

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 15, 2023

Conversation

EvanBacon
Copy link
Contributor

@EvanBacon EvanBacon commented Jan 13, 2023

Why

  • It's still 2x faster than modern metro

How

  • Ignore react-native/Libraries/Events/EventPolyfill.js in the fast pass because it uses flow features that Sucrase doesn't seem to support.

Test Plan

  • Transpile an Expo SDK 47 project successfully

Checklist

@expo-bot expo-bot added the bot: suggestions ExpoBot has some suggestions label Jan 13, 2023
EvanBacon and others added 2 commits January 13, 2023 16:47
Co-authored-by: Expo Bot <34669131+expo-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@expo-bot expo-bot added bot: passed checks ExpoBot has nothing to complain about and removed bot: suggestions ExpoBot has some suggestions labels Jan 13, 2023
@EvanBacon EvanBacon merged commit c423c16 into main Jan 15, 2023
@EvanBacon EvanBacon deleted the @evanbacon/metro-config/fix-exotic branch January 15, 2023 00:39
byCedric pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2023
# Why

- It's still 2x faster than modern metro

<!--
Please describe the motivation for this PR, and link to relevant GitHub
issues, forums posts, or feature requests.
-->

# How

- Ignore `react-native/Libraries/Events/EventPolyfill.js` in the fast
pass because it uses [flow
features](https://github.com/facebook/react-native/blob/8befb740d6cd3de6ead067ac01b70c37d4b5b1bc/Libraries/Events/EventPolyfill.js#L32)
that Sucrase doesn't seem to support.

<!--
How did you build this feature or fix this bug and why?
-->

# Test Plan

- Transpile an Expo SDK 47 project successfully

<!--
Please describe how you tested this change and how a reviewer could
reproduce your test, especially if this PR does not include automated
tests! If possible, please also provide terminal output and/or
screenshots demonstrating your test/reproduction.
-->

# Checklist

<!--
Please check the appropriate items below if they apply to your diff.
This is required for changes to Expo modules.
-->

- [ ] Documentation is up to date to reflect these changes (eg:
https://docs.expo.dev and README.md).
- [ ] Conforms with the [Documentation Writing Style
Guide](https://github.com/expo/expo/blob/main/guides/Expo%20Documentation%20Writing%20Style%20Guide.md)
- [ ] This diff will work correctly for `expo prebuild` & EAS Build (eg:
updated a module plugin).

Co-authored-by: Expo Bot <34669131+expo-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot: passed checks ExpoBot has nothing to complain about
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants