Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update nonAPI.txt #227

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Update nonAPI.txt #227

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Please review the diff and run /bindings command manually.

@CGMossa
Copy link
Member

CGMossa commented Apr 22, 2024

@yutannihilation done! Can you review/approve?

@yutannihilation
Copy link
Contributor

I can, but my approval is powerless.

@CGMossa
Copy link
Member

CGMossa commented Apr 22, 2024

I can, but my approval is powerless.

I'd appreciate it. A PR approved by you, is very valued. Regardless of the power to merge.

@yutannihilation
Copy link
Contributor

Hm, okay. Then, let me hold my approval for a while. It seems they are actively messing the list of the "non-API"s. They put all the ALTREP-related APIs to the list. I'm wondering if they are sane...

r-devel/r-svn@1bfb5da
r-devel/r-svn@1379f43

@CGMossa CGMossa marked this pull request as draft April 23, 2024 13:09
@yutannihilation
Copy link
Contributor

Could you update the non-API text again? It might keep updated, but I think it's good time.

@eitsupi
Copy link
Contributor

eitsupi commented Apr 23, 2024

I saw your post on the R devel mailing list. Thanks for digging into this.

@yutannihilation
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, but my inquiry was just out of my own curiosity about ALTREP. Please jump in the discussion if you have opinions about API :)

Note that, while they withdrew the changes about ALTREP, it seems they are serious about other ones. This is going to be tough...

e.g. https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_vctrs.html

@CGMossa
Copy link
Member

CGMossa commented Apr 23, 2024

Status: We need to wait some more for this, as R-devel have an evolving discussion. Please ping us when the conversation has.. converged.

@yutannihilation
Copy link
Contributor

R-devel have an evolving discussion.

Which one do you mean? If you are talking about this thread I started, there's no discussion related to the entry points deleted in this PR.

https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2024-April/083339.html

I'd recommend the extendr members to take these breaking changes seriously. It's fine not to merge this for now, but you should assess the impact of losing these APIs.

@eitsupi
Copy link
Contributor

eitsupi commented May 6, 2024

Any update on this?

@CGMossa
Copy link
Member

CGMossa commented May 6, 2024

Yes. I already have a PR that needs review and merging of the current changes to libr-Sys. Once that lands, I will immediately jump on this.

The PR

extendr/extendr#742

If you got any time and patience, I'd appreciate your review. It will help the extendr contributors approving my PR.

@eitsupi
Copy link
Contributor

eitsupi commented May 6, 2024

If you got any time and patience, I'd appreciate your review. It will help the extendr contributors approving my PR.

Thanks. However, its content seems to be beyond my skills.

@CGMossa CGMossa marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2024 15:31
@CGMossa CGMossa closed this May 9, 2024
@CGMossa CGMossa deleted the update_nonAPI_txt branch May 9, 2024 17:00
@CGMossa CGMossa mentioned this pull request May 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants