-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible Improper Use of Lock Guard #271
Labels
Comments
Are you sure? ... hmm, that clang warning seems to suggest that might be the case. Weird. |
eyalroz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 9, 2021
…s life on the same line; now it's named.
eyalroz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 9, 2021
…s life on the same line; now it's named.
eyalroz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 9, 2021
…s life on the same line; now it's named.
eyalroz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 9, 2021
…s life on the same line; now it's named.
eyalroz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2021
…s life on the same line; now it's named.
eyalroz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2021
…s life on the same line; now it's named.
eyalroz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 10, 2021
…s life on the same line; now it's named.
eyalroz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 14, 2022
…s life on the same line; now it's named.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In
profiling.cpp
, thelock_guard
variables are not named. My understanding is that this means they will be destroyed immediately which is probably not the intention for the RAII objects.Example:
This was caught by a clang warning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: