Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IBX-808: As an Editor, I want to be able to reset starting location for ezobjectrelation FieldType #1880

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 6, 2021

Conversation

konradoboza
Copy link
Member

@konradoboza konradoboza commented Sep 1, 2021

Question Answer
Tickets IBX-808
Bugfix? no
Improvement? yes
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Tests pass? yes
Doc needed? no
License GPL-2.0

Excerpt from JIRA:

Currently, after selecting "Starting Location" in ezobjectrelation settings, there is no way to reset it. This might get problematic when, for some reason, the initial content is not visible in UDW due to tree_root parameter usage or associated user permissions.

Checklist:

  • Coding standards ($ composer fix-cs)
  • Ready for Code Review

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 1, 2021

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@konradoboza konradoboza removed their assignment Sep 2, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@kacper-wieczorek-ibexa kacper-wieczorek-ibexa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Qa -approved - Function 'Reset start location' at 'ezobjectrelation' is added and works properly for v2.5.23.

@mikadamczyk mikadamczyk merged commit 42445c0 into 1.5 Sep 6, 2021
@mikadamczyk mikadamczyk deleted the ibx-808-resetting-starting-location branch September 6, 2021 13:44
@mikadamczyk
Copy link
Contributor

Could you merge it up @konradoboza ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
7 participants