Skip to content

fabiocicerchia/code-challenge-review-checklist

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

2 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Code Challenge Review Checklist

An Opinionated Checklist for Reviewing a Code Challenge

screenshot

Algorithm

  1. BigO
  2. Recursive Approach
  3. Covers edge cases
  4. Example provided matches
  5. Return values matches

Clean Code

  1. Production ready
  2. No dead code
  3. No commented code
  4. Namespace usage
  5. No global variables
  6. Correct visibility modifiers
  7. No duplicated code
  8. No empty blocks
  9. Correct data types or structures
  10. Design patterns
  11. No mixed tabs vs spaces
  12. No Getters & Setters
  13. Use Exceptions rather than return codes
  14. Don't return null
  15. Make class final if not being used for inheritance
  16. Dependency Injection
  17. No Dependency Cycles

Coding Style

  1. Code linted
  2. Respecting community standards
  3. No issue phpcbf
  4. No issue php-cs-fixer
  5. Folder structure
  6. No debug code

Complexity

  1. No complex expressions
  2. No bitwise operations
  3. No magic variables
  4. No magic values
  5. No magic methods
  6. Law of Demeter
  7. No over engineered

Documentation

  1. DocBlocks
  2. README file
  3. Usage
  4. Code readability
  5. CLI help
  6. No TODOs
  7. No HACKs
  8. Logs
  9. Unusual behaviour is commented
  10. UML

Environment

  1. Dockerized
  2. Docker-compose
  3. .env file

i18n

  1. Translations

Language

  1. Package manager
  2. Version within EOL
  3. Using most recent version

Paradigms

  1. DRY
  2. GRASP
  3. Quick & dirty
  4. SOLID
  5. OOP

Performance

  1. Speed
  2. Number of loops

Presentation

  1. Color shell

Readability

  1. Variables names
  2. Spelling
  3. No double negations
  4. No nested if, for, ...

Security

  1. No Buffer overflow
  2. No Freezing (infinite loop, memory leaks)
  3. No stacktraces
  4. Immutable variables
  5. Exceptions catching
  6. Closing resources (files, streams, ...)
  7. Input validation
  8. No deprecates
  9. No warnings
  10. No eval

Tests

  1. Unit tests
  2. Functional tests
  3. Coverage > 80%
  4. CI/CD tools

Versioning

  1. Git repo
  2. Many small commits
  3. Good commit messages
  4. .gitignore

About

Checklist of aspects that the source code could/should/must have in order to score a pass in an interview coding challenge.

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Languages