Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use apiGroupName in generated package for OpenShiftClient Handler/OperationsImpl #3081

Merged

Conversation

rohanKanojia
Copy link
Member

@rohanKanojia rohanKanojia commented May 6, 2021

Description

Right now all OpenShiftClient's Handler/OperationsImpl classes get
generated in one package io.fabric8.openshift.client.handlers/io.fabric8.openshift.client.dsl.internal

This creates problems if we want to provide handlers for resources with
same names but from different packages. Hence, we should use apiGroup
name in packages in order to segregate handlers/operations classes as
per their respective apiGroup

Related to #2949

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change
  • Chore (non-breaking change which doesn't affect codebase;
    test, version modification, documentation, etc.)

Checklist

  • Code contributed by me aligns with current project license: Apache 2.0
  • I Added CHANGELOG entry regarding this change
  • I have implemented unit tests to cover my changes
  • I have added/updated the javadocs and other documentation accordingly
  • No new bugs, code smells, etc. in SonarCloud report
  • I tested my code in Kubernetes
  • I tested my code in OpenShift

@rohanKanojia rohanKanojia force-pushed the pr/openshift-client-handlers-apigroups branch from 59af940 to cddd84b Compare May 6, 2021 11:19
@rohanKanojia rohanKanojia force-pushed the pr/openshift-client-handlers-apigroups branch 2 times, most recently from 3975733 to c10af9a Compare May 6, 2021 16:40
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 6, 2021

@rohanKanojia rohanKanojia removed the wip label May 7, 2021
…rationsImpl

Right now all OpenShiftClient's Handler/OperationsImpl classes get
generated in one package `io.fabric8.openshift.client.handlers`/`io.fabric8.openshift.client.dsl.internal`

This creates problems if we want to provide handlers for resources with
same names but from different packages. Hence, we should use apiGroup
name in packages in order to segregate handlers/operations classes as
per their respective apiGroup
@manusa manusa force-pushed the pr/openshift-client-handlers-apigroups branch from c10af9a to 16d7e85 Compare May 12, 2021 09:39
Copy link
Member

@manusa manusa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thx!

@manusa manusa merged commit 4dae131 into fabric8io:master May 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants