Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bumped postcss-normalize to v10 #10946

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Bluefitdev
Copy link

postcss-normalize@10.0.0 was released with support for PostCSS 8

We should bump it after merging #10456

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Hi @Bluefitdev!

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.

Action Required

In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@fb.com. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks!

@DrogoNevets
Copy link

DrogoNevets commented May 11, 2021

@Bluefitdev are you aware your PR doesnt build?
only asking as our build step has an audit dependency check in it, and is currently failing due to postcss

@Bluefitdev
Copy link
Author

Bluefitdev commented May 11, 2021

Yeah @DrogoNevets , Node 10 is not supported anymore from postcss 8 postcss-normalize.. But i'm not sure what happened for some node12 eject test. Have to test more sorry

Edit: Clarified by @camjackson that actually postcss-normalize v10 requires node 12

@DrogoNevets
Copy link

In our pipeline, i think its complaining about a new instance needing the new keyword, so I am guessing theyve made something a class, that wasnt originally

@derrabus derrabus mentioned this pull request May 12, 2021
@camjackson
Copy link

Actually I think postcss 8 itself supports node v10 just fine: https://github.com/postcss/postcss/blob/main/package.json#L6

It's postcss-normalize 10 that requires node 12+: https://github.com/csstools/postcss-normalize/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#1000-april-28-2021

Is that going to be a blocker? The CRA docs say "You’ll need to have Node >= 10", but is there any scope to bump that up to v12? It seems like we can't get postcss 8 into react-scripts without doing so.

For reference, node v12 came out a little over 2 years ago.

@Bluefitdev
Copy link
Author

FYI, after inspecting, most test fails on node 12 because of this:

FAIL fixtures/mjs-support/index.test.js (658.57 s)
  ● can use mjs library in development

    : Timeout - Async callback was not invoked within the 300000 ms timeout specified by jest.setTimeout.Timeout - Async callback was not invoked within the 300000 ms timeout specified by jest.setTimeout.Error:

      3 | const puppeteer = require('puppeteer');
      4 |
    > 5 | test('can use mjs library in development', async () => {
        | ^
      6 |   const { port, done } = await testSetup.scripts.start();
      7 |
      8 |   const browser = await puppeteer.launch({ headless: true });

      at new Spec (../node_modules/jest-jasmine2/build/jasmine/Spec.js:116:22)
      at Object.<anonymous> (fixtures/mjs-support/index.test.js:5:1)

  ● can use mjs library in production

    : Timeout - Async callback was not invoked within the 300000 ms timeout specified by jest.setTimeout.Timeout - Async callback was not invoked within the 300000 ms timeout specified by jest.setTimeout.Error:

      21 |   }
      22 | });
    > 23 | test('can use mjs library in production', async () => {
         | ^
      24 |   await testSetup.scripts.build();
      25 |   const { port, done } = await testSetup.scripts.serve();
      26 |

      at new Spec (../node_modules/jest-jasmine2/build/jasmine/Spec.js:116:22)
      at Object.<anonymous> (fixtures/mjs-support/index.test.js:23:1)

A worker process has failed to exit gracefully and has been force exited. This is likely caused by tests leaking due to improper teardown. Try running with --detectOpenHandles to find leaks.
Snapshot Summary
 › 4 snapshots failed from 1 test suite. Inspect your code changes or re-run jest with `-u` to update them.

Test Suites: 5 failed, 7 passed, 12 total
Tests:       11 failed, 22 passed, 33 total
Snapshots:   4 failed, 6 passed, 10 total
Time:        695.165 s
Ran all test suites.
++ set +x
e2e-behavior.sh: ERROR! An error was encountered executing line 88.
Cleaning up.
yarn config v1.22.5
success Set "registry" to "https://registry.yarnpkg.com".
Done in 0.04s.
Exiting with error.
The STDIO streams did not close within 10 seconds of the exit event from process '/bin/bash'. This may indicate a child process inherited the STDIO streams and has not yet exited.
##[error]Bash exited with code '1'.
Finishing: Run tests

@raix
Copy link
Contributor

raix commented May 14, 2021

@Bluefitdev maybe we should remove the LinuxNode10 entry in the azure-pipelines-test-job.yml?
Edit: In general the test suite is broken and we should likely either fix it or skip the failing tests for now... (Last merged pull-requests only had "kitchensink"+"Simple"+"OldNode" tests passing)

@Bluefitdev
Copy link
Author

Bluefitdev commented May 16, 2021

Can I remove the Node10 from pipeline in azure-pipelines.yml ? Would that okay from CRA team?

  - template: azure-pipelines-test-job.yml
    parameters:
      name: Behavior
      testScript: tasks/e2e-behavior.sh
      configurations:
        LinuxNode10: { vmImage: 'ubuntu-16.04', nodeVersion: 10.x }
        LinuxNode12: { vmImage: 'ubuntu-16.04', nodeVersion: 12.x }
        WindowsNode10: { vmImage: 'windows-2019', nodeVersion: 10.x }
        WindowsNode12: { vmImage: 'windows-2019', nodeVersion: 12.x }
        MacNode10: { vmImage: 'macOS-10.15', nodeVersion: 10.x }
        MacNode12: { vmImage: 'macOS-10.15', nodeVersion: 12.x }

Edit: Removed node 10, lets see if the behaviour test works this time

@raix
Copy link
Contributor

raix commented May 17, 2021

Only kitchensink/simple/oldnode are passing - the rest of the tests have been broken for a while.

Copy link
Contributor

@raix raix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A small pr that hopefully fixes the postcss 8 update

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 26, 2021

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 26, 2021
@derrabus
Copy link

Dear Mr. bot, please don't close this PR.

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jun 26, 2021
@robertwt7
Copy link

We need release please

@mrmckeb
Copy link
Contributor

mrmckeb commented Jul 2, 2021

For reference, we still support Node 10, and this PR breaks Node 10 support which is why we haven't merged, yet. We're hoping to get this out soon though.

@raix
Copy link
Contributor

raix commented Jul 2, 2021

Ref: csstools/postcss-normalize#56

@tim-phillips
Copy link

postcss-normalize is at v10. Can this PR be closed?

"postcss-normalize": "10.0.0",

https://github.com/facebook/create-react-app/blob/main/packages/react-scripts/package.json

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 9, 2022

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jan 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants