Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature: Pluggable infrastructure #46

Closed
JoelMarcey opened this issue Aug 8, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Feature: Pluggable infrastructure #46

JoelMarcey opened this issue Aug 8, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
difficulty: advanced Issues that are complex, e.g. large scoping for long-term maintainability. feature This is not a bug or issue with Docusausus, per se. It is a feature request for the future.

Comments

@JoelMarcey
Copy link
Contributor

We need to figure out a way to make Docusaurus pluggable.

There are features we are not going to support that some people may want. How can we make it easy for folks to add those features.
@JoelMarcey JoelMarcey added the feature This is not a bug or issue with Docusausus, per se. It is a feature request for the future. label Oct 24, 2017
@JoelMarcey JoelMarcey reopened this Oct 30, 2017
@yangshun yangshun added the difficulty: advanced Issues that are complex, e.g. large scoping for long-term maintainability. label Apr 23, 2018
@endiliey endiliey mentioned this issue Jun 3, 2018
Merged
@endiliey endiliey mentioned this issue Sep 21, 2018
Merged
@endiliey
Copy link
Contributor

endiliey commented Mar 6, 2019

Closing this due to inactivity and since its definitely part of v2 roadmap

@endiliey endiliey closed this as completed Mar 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
difficulty: advanced Issues that are complex, e.g. large scoping for long-term maintainability. feature This is not a bug or issue with Docusausus, per se. It is a feature request for the future.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@yangshun @JoelMarcey @endiliey