Overloding methods in class without declare

[rpominov]

Using declare we can overload methods in classes:

declare class Foo {
  bar(a: number, b: string): number;
  bar(b: string): number;
}

But is it possible without declare?
Here is a not working example just to illustrate what I mean:

class Foo {
  bar(a: number, b: string): number; 
  bar(b: string): number;
  bar(aOrB, maybeB) {
    return maybeB !== undefined ? maybeB : aOrB;
  }
}

[andreypopp]

See intersection types example:

/* @flow */
class Foo {}
class Bar {}
declare var f: ((x: Foo) => void) & ((x: Bar) => void);
f(new Foo());
f(new Bar());
f(true); // Flow will error here.

It should work outside of declarations too.

[rpominov]

Right. But how do I use this inside class {}?

[rpominov]

Just to clarify: you've made function f overloaded, but I need to make a class method overloaded.

[andreypopp]

@rpominov ah... right, not sure how it fits with method types declarations. But the case you described can be typed with:

class Foo {

  bar(aOrB: number | string, maybeB?: string): number {
    return maybeB !== undefined ? maybeB : aOrB;
  }
}

right?

[andreypopp]

@rpominov disregard my last response, you have a dependency between args. Waiting for some smarter one to answer that then.

[rpominov]

Not quite same thing.

In your version bar(1) is allowed, while with proper overloading if second argument not provided first one must be a string.

But anyway, this is not my real case. I need this for a static method similar to Promise.all().

[vkurchatkin]

I don't think it's possible. The easiest way around is to have a separate declaration and cast implementation to declaration type via any.

[rpominov]

That is an option. But will I have to duplicate all other methods in declaration and in implementation then?

[vkurchatkin]

But will I have to duplicate all other methods in declaration and in implementation then?

Yes, I think that's the only option without affecting runtime behaviour

[rpominov]

Seems like a room for improvement for Flow then. There should be a way to do this somehow without duplication.

[avikchaudhuri]

The problem is, it's hard to check for Flow that a method body satisfies multiple signatures. Which is why we implemented it for declare class first, since they have no method bodies. :P

This should be fixed.