New node type API #47
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Summary: Test Plan: Reviewers: Subscribers: Tasks: Tags:
|
Instead of having The previous API was a poor choice from the early days of Lexical iOS, and the new API makes it a lot more clear how node subclasses should declare their node type. |
|
@amyworrall has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
|
@amyworrall merged this pull request in 399d547. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New node type API
Summary:
Test Plan:
Reviewers:
Subscribers:
Tasks:
Tags: