Lower key navigation command priority for Tables #3107
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tylerjbainbridge
requested review from
trueadm,
zurfyx,
fantactuka,
acywatson and
thegreatercurve
as code owners
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
fantactuka
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2022
acywatson
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2022
acywatson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2022
* Lower key stroke handling priority for tables * Lower key stroke handling priority for tables
thegreatercurve
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2022
* Lower key stroke handling priority for tables * Lower key stroke handling priority for tables
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was an issue reported where Table key navigation took priority over Typeaheads that were open inside of them. This PR and #3106 solve this.