Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Formatting #1319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2014
Merged

Formatting #1319

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/_posts/2014-03-28-the-road-to-1.0.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ This is really connected to everything. We want to keep the API as simple as pos

## ES6

Before we even launched React publicly, members of the team were talking about how we could leverage ES6, namely classes`, to improve the experience of creating React components. Calling `React.createClass(...)` isn't great. We don't quite have the right answer here yet, but we're close. We want to make sure we make this as simple as possible. It could look like this:
Before we even launched React publicly, members of the team were talking about how we could leverage ES6, namely classes, to improve the experience of creating React components. Calling `React.createClass(...)` isn't great. We don't quite have the right answer here yet, but we're close. We want to make sure we make this as simple as possible. It could look like this:

```js
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
Expand Down