Rename SafeValue to ToStringValue #13376
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Following up on the changes I made in facebook#13367, @gaearon suggest that "safe" could be read as necessary for security. To avoid misleading a reader, I'm changing the name. A few names where discussed in the previous PR. I think `ToStringValue` makes sense since the value itself is not a string yet but an opaque type that can be cast to a string. For the actual string concatenation, I've used `toString` now to avoid confusion: `toStringValueToString` is super weird and it's namespaced anyhow. Definitely open for suggestions here. :) I'll wait until we wrap up facebook#13362 and take care of rebase afterwards.
nhunzaker
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following up on the changes I made in #13367, @gaearon suggest that "safe" could be read as necessary for security. To avoid misleading future readers, I'm changing the name.
A few names where discussed in the previous PR. I think
ToStringValuemakes sense since the value itself is not a string yet but an opaque type that can be cast to a string. For the actual string concatenation, I've usedtoStringnow to avoid confusion.toStringValueToStringis super weird and the function is namespaced anyway.Definitely open for other suggestions here as well. My plan is to wait until we wrap up #13362 and then rebase afterwards.