Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify the license of /runtime file #66

Closed
termi opened this issue Nov 29, 2013 · 1 comment · Fixed by #69
Closed

Clarify the license of /runtime file #66

termi opened this issue Nov 29, 2013 · 1 comment · Fixed by #69

Comments

@termi
Copy link
Contributor

termi commented Nov 29, 2013

Should I add LICENSE and PATENTS files in the root of any project where I am using regenerator and include /runtime file from it inside project code? When I use /runtime file it's also brings this license text:

This source code is licensed under the BSD-style license found in the
LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. An additional grant
of patent rights can be found in the PATENTS file in the same directory.

which is not valid due I don't have original LICENSE and PATENTS files
@benjamn
Copy link
Collaborator

benjamn commented Nov 29, 2013

That's a good question. Thoughts, @jamesgpearce?

benjamn added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2013
@benjamn
Update the license header to be less ambiguous.
e2696d2 
This is especially important when the runtime/*.js files are included in
other projects, as @termi has pointed out.

Closes #66.
@benjamn benjamn mentioned this issue Dec 9, 2013
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Update the license header to be less ambiguous facebook/regenerator
2 participants
@benjamn @termi