Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Filter::mergeWith for BytesRange and BytesValue #153

Open
mbasmanova opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Implement Filter::mergeWith for BytesRange and BytesValue #153

mbasmanova opened this issue Sep 2, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@mbasmanova
Copy link
Contributor

Filter::mergeWith API is used to merge filters pushed down from the join to topN operators into collocated table scan. Currently this API is implemented for numeric types. This task is to implement the API for strings.

#119 PR introduced Filter::mergeWith() API with implementation for numeric types.

#103 introduced filter pushdown that uses Filter::mergeWith() API.

CC: @pedroerp @aditi-pandit @majetideepak

@mbasmanova
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC: @kgpai

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 11, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity in the last year. If you feel that this issue is important, add a comment explaining why the issue is still relevant and the stale tag will be removed; otherwise it will be closed in 14 days. This is an attempt to ensure that our open issues remain valuable and relevant so that we can keep track of what needs to be done and prioritize the right things.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Sep 11, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Sep 26, 2022
@kgpai kgpai reopened this Oct 10, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Oct 10, 2022
@HannanKan
Copy link

@mbasmanova Could you please assign this issue to me?

@mbasmanova mbasmanova assigned HannanKan and unassigned atanu1991 Mar 20, 2023
@rterror
Copy link

rterror commented Jun 7, 2023

I think this issue can close because it has finished in #297.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants