Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2023. It is now read-only.

Some questions about coordination transformation #8

Closed
maobenz opened this issue Mar 20, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Some questions about coordination transformation #8

maobenz opened this issue Mar 20, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@maobenz
Copy link

maobenz commented Mar 20, 2022

Hello,
Thanks for releasing your code. I am impressed by your work. Now I hope to run your code with my our dataset. I have two questions.

Firstly, I see the pose.txt is used in the code to put the objects in the center. If I use my own data, will the file still work?

Secondly, I see the code set the raypos is among -1 and 1. Is it the matrix in this pose file that narrows the range to -1 to 1? My own dataset' range is different.

Thirdly, does the code limit the scope of the template? Does it have to be between 0-255?

Thanks a lot in advance!

@stephenlombardi
Copy link
Contributor

  1. No, you need to create your own pose.txt. See this comment for a little more information on the pose.txt file: Training with our own data #1 (comment)

  2. There's two parts to it, basically. The pose.txt will center the scene so that [0,0,0] is near the center of the object. There's also a worldscale parameter that's passed to the dryice dataset class that scales the coordinates down so that they're in [-1, 1].

  3. There's no limit to the range of the template, it can be any non-negative floating point values.

-- Steve

@maobenz
Copy link
Author

maobenz commented Apr 12, 2022

Thanks! I have another question about the fixedimage. Could i feed different images with different views at every iterations? My dataset has many different views and i can confirm every time i will feed images with the same motion but different views, not only fixed 3 or 4 views.

@stephenlombardi
Copy link
Contributor

You could feed different views to the fixedimage but I would guess it would degrade performance a bit. It's also possible you would need to adjust the learning rate a bit to deal with the additional variation in input data. I'm not sure though as I haven't tried it.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants