infra: configure lint rule array-type

[Shinigami92]

This configures the lint rule https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/array-type/

We could decide if we want to configure it with:

{ default: "array-simple" } or { default: "array-simple", readonly: "generic" }

The difference would be:

number[]
Array<Foo & Bar>
readonly number[]
ReadonlyArray<Foo & Bar>

vs

number[]
Array<Foo & Bar>
ReadonlyArray<number> // <- this is different
ReadonlyArray<Foo & Bar>

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1793 (4b56c15) into next (be77179) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 89.47%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             next    #1793   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.63%   99.63%           
=======================================
  Files        2346     2346           
  Lines      235000   235002    +2     
  Branches     1133     1133           
=======================================
+ Hits       234145   234147    +2     
  Misses        833      833           
  Partials       22       22           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/definitions/science.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/modules/helpers/index.ts	99.20% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/internet/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/random/index.ts	99.12% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/string/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[ST-DDT]

The difference would be:

Please add a hint what the new one is^^

---

I generally agree with adding this rule, I just consider ReadonlyArray<number> to be easier to read.

IMO the readonly refers to the array and thus should be "close" to the array.
In readonly number[] you have the array element type mixed in between.

Is there a reason for the shuffled declaration?

[Shinigami92]

Please add a hint what the new one is ^^

both are new (?!)
we could decide for one of these both option configurations

[Shinigami92]

I generally agree with adding this rule, I just consider ReadonlyArray to be easier to read.

IMO the readonly refers to the array and thus should be "close" to the array.
In readonly number[] you have the array element type mixed in between.

Is there a reason for the shuffled declaration?

This is exactly what I also thought!
Okay I will switch to the second