chore: activate noImplicitAny

[Shinigami92]

closes #1837

This PR does only build time and no runtime changes on purpose
Otherwise I would suggest to modify some codeflow in later PRs (if really needed)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1839 (edb815a) into next (1399375) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 92.72%.

❗ Current head edb815a differs from pull request most recent head 648d0a7. Consider uploading reports for the commit 648d0a7 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             next    #1839      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.63%   99.62%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        2346     2346              
  Lines      236394   235810     -584     
  Branches     1144     1136       -8     
==========================================
- Hits       235527   234918     -609     
- Misses        845      870      +25     
  Partials       22       22              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/utils/types.ts	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/modules/airline/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/animal/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/color/index.ts	99.79% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
src/modules/commerce/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/company/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/database/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/datatype/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/modules/date/index.ts	99.79% <100.00%> (-0.21%)	⬇️
src/modules/finance/index.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 23 more

[Shinigami92]

@xDivisionByZerox Oh I see, the Callable was just a replacement for Function which should not be used in TS as a type as it is a real thing (e.g. like String)

The suggested way is just to use () => void instead and therefore I removed the type alias and inlined it as this is the way it should be done and is suggested by TS

This also removed the bad worded comment For some strange reason ... which sounds a bit unprofessional

[Shinigami92]

The "test"-code failed 👀
I need to check that later, I will leave my home soon and come back in some hours

[ST-DDT]

The suggested way is just to use () => void instead and therefore I removed the type alias and inlined it as this is the way it should be done and is suggested by TS

This also removed the bad worded comment For some strange reason ... which sounds a bit unprofessional

Soon: