docs: check and improve handling of duplicate tags

[ST-DDT]

Ref: #2439

• Check eslint-plugin-unicorn rules to enable/configure/disable #2439

---

Preparation work for enableing the unicorn/require-array-join-separator lint rule.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2444 (dbe9739) into next (9dd57d7) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             next    #2444   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.58%   99.58%           
=======================================
  Files        2805     2805           
  Lines      250168   250168           
  Branches     1106     1107    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits       249118   249120    +2     
+ Misses       1022     1020    -2     
  Partials       28       28           

Files	Coverage Δ
src/modules/helpers/index.ts	99.01% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[matthewmayer]

This is a behavior change no? The default for join is ,

[ST-DDT]

Technically yes. Practically not, because we only ever have one.

[matthewmayer]

If we did have more than one should that throw an error?

[ST-DDT]

If we did have more than one should that throw an error?

Changed. It looks like there was one method with two @throws tags, that I have missed in my earlier checks.

[matthewmayer]

This PR should probably be renamed now then

[ST-DDT]

This PR should probably be renamed now then

The title is already very long so appending it might be hard.
Do you have a suggestion?

[matthewmayer]

Split the changes about allowing one one of each tag to a seperate PR?

[ST-DDT]

IMO this only does a single thing, what should I split here?

I renamed it to reflect its doc impact

[xDivisionByZerox]

Preview of the changes on multiple @throw tags:

---

I don't know if I'm the biggest fan as you can't tell right now that these are 2 distinct throw situations. But it is better than not having them at all.

[fisker]

This end up with nothing related to require-array-join-separator at all... LOL

require-array-join-separator mean to make code easier for beginners and for consistency.

[xDivisionByZerox]

This end up with nothing related to require-array-join-separator at all... LOL

require-array-join-separator mean to make code easier for beginners and for consistency.

True. Enabling the rule in this PR is kind of missleading.