Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sign Packages and Linux Repositories with SHA256. #1758

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2021

Conversation

twa16
Copy link
Contributor

@twa16 twa16 commented Oct 18, 2021

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind feature

If contributing rules or changes to rules, please make sure to also uncomment one of the following line:

/kind rule-update

/kind rule-create

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area build

/area engine

/area rules

/area tests

/area proposals

What this PR does / why we need it:
Currently, Falco Linux packages are signed with SHA1. This prevents the installation of Falco on high-assurance systems that do not allow for the installation of packages without signatures made using SHA256.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #1751

Special notes for your reviewer:
The SHA256 algorithms should be well supported by Linux distributions in use today. I do not believe this this will break installs for anyone.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Linux packages and repositories that are created with the modified build scripts will have newer signature algorithms.

update: Linux packages are now signed with SHA256

@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Oct 18, 2021

Welcome @twa16! It looks like this is your first PR to falcosecurity/falco 🎉

@flickerfly
Copy link

Did CircleCI just fail to return results?

@twa16
Copy link
Contributor Author

twa16 commented Oct 26, 2021

Anything needed from me on this PR?

@leogr
Copy link
Member

leogr commented Oct 29, 2021

Closing and re-opening to trigger the CI
/close

@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Oct 29, 2021

@leogr: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Closing and re-opening to trigger the CI
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@poiana poiana closed this Oct 29, 2021
@leogr
Copy link
Member

leogr commented Oct 29, 2021

/reopen

@poiana poiana reopened this Oct 29, 2021
@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Oct 29, 2021

@leogr: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@leogr
Copy link
Member

leogr commented Oct 29, 2021

/milestone 0.31.0

@poiana poiana added this to the 0.31.0 milestone Oct 29, 2021
@flickerfly
Copy link

Looks like the one fail here is also on the main branch right now so probably no related to the PR.

@leogr
Copy link
Member

leogr commented Nov 2, 2021

Looks like the one fail here is also on the main branch right now so probably no related to the PR.

#1764 should address the failing test. Let's wait for it.

@leogr
Copy link
Member

leogr commented Nov 9, 2021

Hey @twa16

#1764 has been merged into master. Could you rebase on master? 🙏 Once done, the failing test should pass.

Signed-off-by: Manuel Gauto <mgauto@mgenterprises.org>
@twa16
Copy link
Contributor Author

twa16 commented Nov 11, 2021

@leogr Ok, rebased! Let's see how it goes.

@leogr
Copy link
Member

leogr commented Nov 11, 2021

Closing and re-opening to trigger the CI
/close

@poiana poiana closed this Nov 11, 2021
@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Nov 11, 2021

@leogr: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Closing and re-opening to trigger the CI
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@leogr
Copy link
Member

leogr commented Nov 11, 2021

/reopen

@poiana poiana reopened this Nov 11, 2021
@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Nov 11, 2021

@leogr: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Member

@leogr leogr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, now!

@twa16 thank you for this PR 🙏

@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Nov 11, 2021

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: f60f9f0e14164f69cce4a38295aca9a6120c459d

@leogr
Copy link
Member

leogr commented Nov 11, 2021

/approve
/milestone 0.31.0

@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Nov 11, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: leogr, twa16

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana poiana merged commit 2312afe into falcosecurity:master Nov 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add SHA256 Signatures for RPMs
5 participants