Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cleanup(config): add more info #2758

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 4, 2023
Merged

Conversation

incertum
Copy link
Contributor

@incertum incertum commented Sep 1, 2023

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind feature

/kind release

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area build

/area engine

/area tests

/area proposals

/area CI

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add more info to the config descriptions, very minor addition.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

cleanup(config): add more info

Signed-off-by: Melissa Kilby <melissa.kilby.oss@gmail.com>
falco.yaml Outdated
#
# With Falco 0.36 and beyond, it's now possible to apply multiple rules that match
# the same event type, eliminating concerns about rule prioritization based on the
# "first match wins" principle. Read more under the `rule_matching` configuration.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you for this, I would just highlight that this has a cost in terms of perf because you have to loop on all rules every time alsp when there is a match...it should be negligible considering that most of the time no rule will match but if we want to be precise there is a penalty :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, nice catch, we shall add this. Is it ok that I added it twice? I believe redundancy could help here.

Co-authored-by: Andrea Terzolo <andreaterzolo3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Melissa Kilby <melissa.kilby.oss@gmail.com>
@poiana poiana added size/S and removed size/XS labels Sep 1, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Andreagit97 Andreagit97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Sep 1, 2023

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: ba82b38b123d280b012a6ac69799001072fefda4

Copy link
Contributor

@FedeDP FedeDP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Thank you Melissa, you are doing a terrific job in improving the UX :)

@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Sep 4, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, FedeDP, incertum

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Andreagit97,FedeDP,incertum]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana poiana merged commit 7957723 into falcosecurity:master Sep 4, 2023
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants