Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cmake format #703

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2019
Merged

cmake format #703

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2019

Conversation

leodido
Copy link
Member

@leodido leodido commented Jul 3, 2019

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

NONE

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adds a .cmake-format file.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@mstemm
Copy link
Contributor

mstemm commented Jul 6, 2019

/lgtm

@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Jul 6, 2019

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 697df4ee02b4509fbf29f31f48eb1bcf06b52e01

Co-Authored-by: Lorenzo Fontana <lo@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Donato <leodidonato@gmail.com>
@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Jul 8, 2019

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fntlnz, mstemm

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana poiana added the lgtm label Jul 8, 2019
@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Jul 8, 2019

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: ec0b1ca338daa0ce0acaba4b10ada503fffa2aaa

@fntlnz fntlnz merged commit f20a5a0 into dev Jul 8, 2019
@poiana poiana deleted the feat/cmake-format branch July 8, 2019 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants