You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Heritability should be
1.844e-05/(1.844e-05 + 3.721e+02) = 4.955657e-08
I guess the calculation of variance may be conducted using blupf90 with 16bit Half-precision floating-point format, so the variances smaller than 6.10x10^-5 may result in minus value. Is it right?
I would like to obtain advices about above results.
Thanks,
Eitaro
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Eitaro,
Your estimate of the genetic variance is essentially 0 for all practical
purposes. All variation is attributed to residual factors.
The negative heritability is just a numerical artefact of the genetic
variance near the boundary of the parameter space and possibly some
assumptions that are simply not met there.
ƒacu.-
On 15/09/2022 02:59, efukatsu wrote:
Hi,
When I executed remlf90(), I obtained following results:
Variance components:
Estimated variances S.E.
genetic 1.844e-05 0.006452
Residual 3.721e+02 27.814000
|Estimate S.E. |
Heritability -9.729e-08 1.747e-05
Heritability should be
1.844e-05/(1.844e-05 + 3.721e+02) = 4.955657e-08
I guess the calculation of variance may be conducted using blupf90
with 16bit Half-precision floating-point format, so the variances
smaller than 6.10x10^-5 may result in minus value. Is it right?
I would like to obtain advices about above results.
Thanks,
Eitaro
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#113>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLOEDUBWYX3ZAUNJ7DL56LV6JYFZANCNFSM6AAAAAAQM5HE2I>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
Hi,
When I executed remlf90(), I obtained following results:
Variance components:
Estimated variances S.E.
genetic 1.844e-05 0.006452
Residual 3.721e+02 27.814000
Heritability -9.729e-08 1.747e-05
Heritability should be
1.844e-05/(1.844e-05 + 3.721e+02) = 4.955657e-08
I guess the calculation of variance may be conducted using blupf90 with 16bit Half-precision floating-point format, so the variances smaller than 6.10x10^-5 may result in minus value. Is it right?
I would like to obtain advices about above results.
Thanks,
Eitaro
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: