We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
在《Long Short-Term Memory Spiking Networks and Their Applications》中提到 t 时刻的 c_t 的计算可能产生 0, 1, 2三种值,而文中采取的做法是将 1, 2 都转变为 1 (为了符合脉冲的形式),但是在惊蛰 rnn.py 的 SpikingLSTMCell 类中,并未对这一问题(可能出现 2 )进行处理。这样的话,是否与约定的脉冲网络的定义有所冲突呢?
最后,依旧感谢惊蛰团队提供这一便捷的SNN框架,期待后续STDP相关模块的引进~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
c0624fc
应该是当是没有注意原文的这句话,现在加上去了
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
在《Long Short-Term Memory Spiking Networks and Their Applications》中提到 t 时刻的 c_t 的计算可能产生 0, 1, 2三种值,而文中采取的做法是将 1, 2 都转变为 1 (为了符合脉冲的形式),但是在惊蛰 rnn.py 的 SpikingLSTMCell 类中,并未对这一问题(可能出现 2 )进行处理。这样的话,是否与约定的脉冲网络的定义有所冲突呢?
最后,依旧感谢惊蛰团队提供这一便捷的SNN框架,期待后续STDP相关模块的引进~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: