Generate setup.py file

[mekanix]

As Python integration with FreeBSD ports is based on setup.py it would be so much easier to maintain it if that file was generated and uploaded. I am sure that FreeBSD is not the only OS that has this limitation, so potentially this will make porting easier for other operating systems, too.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #896 (d676231) into master (d0c295e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            master      #896    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%            
==========================================
  Files           20        33    +13     
  Lines          717       864   +147     
==========================================
+ Hits           717       864   +147     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
fastapi_users/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
fastapi_users/authentication/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
fastapi_users/authentication/authenticator.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
fastapi_users/authentication/backend.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
fastapi_users/authentication/strategy/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
fastapi_users/authentication/strategy/base.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...stapi_users/authentication/strategy/db/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...astapi_users/authentication/strategy/db/adapter.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
fastapi_users/authentication/strategy/db/models.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...stapi_users/authentication/strategy/db/strategy.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 23 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0583d7c...d676231. Read the comment docs.

[frankie567]

Hi @mekanix!

Thank you for this proposal! I may not have all the ins and outs about this but, from what I understood, it sounded like setup.py was more or less deprecated. There is a long thread about this on Flit: pypa/flit#501

I wouldn't mind add this option if it's really needed on some systems, but if you could give me some insights about the status of setup.py in the Python world, it would be really helpful :)

[mekanix]

Thank you for this proposal! I may not have all the ins and outs about this but, from what I understood, it sounded like `setup.py` was more or less deprecated. There is a long thread about this on Flit: pypa/flit#501

Well, it's like Python 2. It is dead, now just the rest of the ecosystem needs to accept that. What I'm trying to say is that build systems in operating systems are slow(er) to adopt new technologies.

I wouldn't mind add this option if it's really needed on some systems, but if you could give me some insights about the status of `setup.py` in the Python world, it would be really helpful :)

I can't speak on behalf of any community, but I will sure make an effort to upgrade Python integration in FreeBSD. Naturally, I have two things to do: 1) research flit and similar build tools more 2) talk to FreeBSD Python team about the best way to go forward. Until then either this PR is needed or I should generate setup.py every time I update port. What do you think is better?

[frankie567]

Well, I would say it doesn't harm to add this option if it helps developers out there. I was being curious about the status of setup.py as there is no clear information (at least to my knowledge) about this. (and also because I know absolutely nothing about FreeBSD 🙃)

[frankie567]

@all-contributors add @mekanix for platform

[allcontributors]

@frankie567

I've put up a pull request to add @mekanix! 🎉

[frankie567]

@mekanix Was your account compromised? 😓

[mekanix]

I guess it was. I changed the password so let's see what happens now.