Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include javadoc jar in Maven repository #5

Closed
benmccann opened this issue Mar 27, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Include javadoc jar in Maven repository #5

benmccann opened this issue Mar 27, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@benmccann
Copy link

I see in the Maven repo jackson-core-asl-1.9.6.jar and jackson-core-asl-1.9.6-sources.jar, but not jackson-core-asl-1.9.6-javadoc.jar. The majority of packages in the Maven Central repository include javadoc jars. A javadoc jar can be useful for tools like Eclipse that make use of these jars. Also, when using the Play 2 framework eclipsify task, I get numerous warnings that jackson-core-asl-1.9.6-javadoc.jar cannot be found, which is pretty annoying.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

This should not be the case for Jackson 2.0.0 any more. 1.9 uses Ant-based build (with Ant-maven-task), so build.xml (or one of things it includes) would need a patch of some kind to enable this. Hopefully we will get a contribution for this.

@benmccann
Copy link
Author

Ah, I see. I didn't even realize there was a Jackson 2. I didn't see it when I looked since the Maven group changed. Feel free to close this issue as I do see the javadoc is there now for 2.0.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Yeah totally understandable given that 2.0.0 was released this sunday! :-)
You can read more about it at http://www.cowtowncoder.com/blog/archives/2012/03/entry_466.html for example.
I think it would still be nice to improve 1.9, so I'll leave this open for now.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Actually, better to close unless someone really needs 1.9 javadocs.

CatherineRSJ added a commit to CatherineRSJ/jackson-core-tests that referenced this issue Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants