-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: add ability to parse empty response #4865
Closed
Closed
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f74db49
Add ability to parse empty response
shaypep e454198
Merge branch 'main' into allow-empty-response-in-schema
shayff ea96124
Fix
shaypep 8c1451f
Merge branch 'allow-empty-response-in-schema' of https://github.com/s…
shaypep 06e8531
add missing code
shaypep 03f32aa
Added @giuliowaitforitdavide test case
shaypep File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here we can consider the structure of the JSONSchemaDraft7
On my PR I was working on something like considering the keys
This could be an idea but I don't know if others agree with me. @Uzlopak what do you think about it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Eomm the main thing about your suggestion is that I'm missing the point when we pass from the
getSchemaSerializer
function in case of empty schemasThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@giuliowaitforitdavide Thanks!
@Eomm I read your suggestion, as I understand we call getSchemaSerializer on income request, the problem here is that we fail to start the server.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will check later - I think we run that function (or similar) during the startup to compile the serialize function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Found, here is where the magic happen:
fastify/lib/validation.js
Line 23 in 5b7fd18
if we skip adding a function to the
acc
(accumulator) the response payload will not be blockedI would add a test with a response schema with a typo on the schema, such as
propppertie
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Eomm Thanks, i'll check that later.
But do we want to skip the whole schema check?