Improved efficiency in StreamPowerLaw and FLexure #8
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@jeanbraun, great! If you think it's worth, could you update the release notes in the docs with a new item summarizing the changes made in this pull request? (as this PR has been merged, you can do that in a new one, or directly push a commit to master is fine too). For better reference, you can also add the number of of this pull request (i.e., "#8"). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note for @benbovy : I have limited the number of GS iterations to 1 in StreamPowerLaw when G=0; I have also decreased the resolution of the flexure code by a factor 2 to make it similar to the original FastScape code.