You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would be nice to have an example or a documentation page to show how to choose the best set of parameters while gridding gravmag data using EQLHarmonic. A good idea would be to start with one of the sample datasets and:
calculate gravity disturbance (using Boule),
project data into Cartesian coordinates,
use itertools to create set of parameters (damping and relative_depth),
use verde.BlockKFold or verde.BlockShuffleSplit to cross-validate the gridder with each set of parameters,
get the best predictor,
grid data onto a regular grid in geodetic coordinates (using the projection argument on the EQLHarmonic.grid() method),
mask distant values with vd.distance_mask.
Maybe we would need to block-reduce (or crop) the original data to speed up computations, specially if CIs will have to run the example.
Are you willing to help implement and maintain this feature? Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description of the desired feature
Would be nice to have an example or a documentation page to show how to choose the best set of parameters while gridding gravmag data using
EQLHarmonic
. A good idea would be to start with one of the sample datasets and:itertools
to create set of parameters (damping
andrelative_depth
),verde.BlockKFold
orverde.BlockShuffleSplit
to cross-validate the gridder with each set of parameters,projection
argument on theEQLHarmonic.grid()
method),vd.distance_mask
.Maybe we would need to block-reduce (or crop) the original data to speed up computations, specially if CIs will have to run the example.
Are you willing to help implement and maintain this feature? Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: