Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve operators together with (not) element of #19

Closed
favu100 opened this issue Jul 8, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Improve operators together with (not) element of #19

favu100 opened this issue Jul 8, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@favu100
Copy link
Owner

favu100 commented Jul 8, 2022

This could be treated similar to constructs like x : NATURAL (which does not generate the infinite set NATURAL, but checks whether x >= 0 instead).

One of such operator is interval. E.g. x : 0..5 should not generate the set with all elements in 0..5, but rather checks whether x >= 0 & x <= 5

Other operators could be improved as well (see kernel_mappings.pl in ProB Prolog: binary_in_boolean_type/2, binary_not_in_boolean_type/2, unary_in_boolean_type/2, unary_not_in_boolean_type/2)

@favu100 favu100 self-assigned this Jul 8, 2022
@favu100 favu100 changed the title Improve interval together with elementOf Improve operators together with (not) element of Jul 8, 2022
@favu100
Copy link
Owner Author

favu100 commented Apr 19, 2024

This issue is solved now

@favu100 favu100 closed this as completed Apr 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant