Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(mint-client): test parallel spends and reissuances #4407

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

elsirion
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #3988. Note that using MemDatabase still leads to deadlocks, but that's not production-ready anyway, so we can track it independently.

@elsirion elsirion force-pushed the 2024-02-test-parallel-client branch 2 times, most recently from 00a32c9 to bddd467 Compare February 24, 2024 16:43
@elsirion elsirion marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2024 17:08
@elsirion elsirion requested a review from a team as a code owner February 24, 2024 17:08
}));
}

let note_bags = futures::stream::iter(spend_tasks)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bags FTW!

dpc
dpc previously approved these changes Feb 25, 2024
maan2003
maan2003 previously approved these changes Feb 26, 2024
@elsirion elsirion added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 26, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Feb 26, 2024
@dpc dpc added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 26, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Feb 26, 2024
@elsirion
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wonder why the linter didn't fail on the PR, will fix tomorrow.

@elsirion elsirion marked this pull request as draft February 26, 2024 20:44
@dpc
Copy link
Contributor

dpc commented Feb 26, 2024

I wonder why the linter didn't fail on the PR, will fix tomorrow.

Landed after what your change is on top of, I guess.

justinmoon
justinmoon previously approved these changes Feb 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@justinmoon justinmoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dpc
Copy link
Contributor

dpc commented Feb 28, 2024

@elsirion We land?

@elsirion elsirion marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2024 18:47
@elsirion elsirion added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 28, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Feb 28, 2024
@elsirion elsirion dismissed stale reviews from maan2003, justinmoon, and dpc via 37a9731 February 28, 2024 20:56
@elsirion
Copy link
Contributor Author

There actually was something to fix.

dpc
dpc previously approved these changes Feb 28, 2024
@dpc
Copy link
Contributor

dpc commented Feb 28, 2024

@elsirion Still seems to be. :D

@elsirion
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, forgot to run clippy with the extra command line options …

modules/fedimint-mint-tests/tests/tests.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@elsirion elsirion added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 29, 2024
Merged via the queue into fedimint:master with commit fe8234a Feb 29, 2024
20 checks passed
@elsirion elsirion deleted the 2024-02-test-parallel-client branch February 29, 2024 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Client is less parallelism-safe than expected
5 participants