Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fedora-review fails to parse rpmlint output #2296

Closed
fedora-copr-github-bot opened this issue Nov 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Fedora-review fails to parse rpmlint output #2296

fedora-copr-github-bot opened this issue Nov 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@fedora-copr-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

fedora-copr-github-bot commented Nov 19, 2022

Original issue: https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/2296
Opened: 2022-08-27 21:56:57
Opened by: frostyx

I was doing a package review (RHBZ 2054410) and fedora-review tool produced

Rpmlint
-------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:

But locally, when running fedora-review -b 2054410, I got

Rpmlint
-------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

shdoc.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary shdoc
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s

nikromen commented at 2022-10-16 19:17:46:

notes for me:

  • the first Cannot parse rpmlint output seems to be bug in fedora-review -> create an issue there (firstly investigate similat bug https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/425)
  • second rpmlint error seems to be an error on our side

nikromen commented at 2022-10-16 20:13:16:

regarding the first Cannot parse rpmlint output - the issue is created here https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/461


nikromen commented at 2022-10-16 20:29:58:

the second bug is reproducable by running
$ fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name NAME --define DISTTAG
EDIT: it's a bug on fedora-review side. I updated the issue mentioned above.
could be also a bug on fedora-review side

@nikromen
Copy link
Member

nikromen commented Feb 8, 2023

this has been resolved by updating rpmlint package

@nikromen nikromen closed this as completed Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants