Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resultsdb/waiverdb: skip updating gating status if it's ignored #5202

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 17, 2023

Conversation

AdamWill
Copy link
Contributor

@AdamWill AdamWill commented Apr 4, 2023

There's no point recalculating the gating status in response to a new result or a new waiver if the status is 'ignored', which means there are no requirements. Doing so just results in this kind of unnecessary pingpong:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0e548f86e7

@AdamWill AdamWill requested a review from a team as a code owner April 4, 2023 23:18
@AdamWill AdamWill force-pushed the consumers-ignored branch 2 times, most recently from 1ca7308 to 2ba3320 Compare April 4, 2023 23:49
@AdamWill
Copy link
Contributor Author

AdamWill commented Apr 5, 2023

I don't think the failure is related to the PR:

conu.backend.docker.container:container.py:485 {"status": "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "HTTPForbidden", "description": "Unauthorized: new_update__POST failed permission check"}]}

There's no point recalculating the gating status in response to
a new result or a new waiver if the status is 'ignored', which
means there are no requirements. Doing so just results in this
kind of unnecessary pingpong:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0e548f86e7

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@mattiaverga mattiaverga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a note for release notes and rebased. LGTM

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 2a26f23 into fedora-infra:develop Apr 17, 2023
31 of 32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants