Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add pound-force inch torque conversion #40

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

adrianinsaval
Copy link

I guess this would be a first step towards ferraridamiano/ConverterNOW#251

Comment on lines +47 to +50
ConversionNode(
coefficientProduct: 0.1129848290854088,
name: TORQUE.poundForceInch,
),
Copy link
Owner

@ferraridamiano ferraridamiano Oct 8, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest to implement it as 1/12 of pound force feet

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to be honest I am not familiar with the laguage, do you have a suggestion on how to reference the value or should I just write 1.35581794902490555/12

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add the ConversionNode as a List to the leafNode property of the pound force feet conversionNode

Copy link
Owner

@ferraridamiano ferraridamiano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this PR! Let's just fix a couple of issue and make the CI happy and then we are ready to merge

@ferraridamiano
Copy link
Owner

There seems to be also format issues. Could you please run dart format .?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants