Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use JSR 107 JCache for CacheManager #67

Closed
clun opened this issue Nov 12, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Use JSR 107 JCache for CacheManager #67

clun opened this issue Nov 12, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@clun
Copy link
Collaborator

clun commented Nov 12, 2015

Become a standard for all cache manager

@clun
Copy link
Collaborator Author

clun commented Nov 29, 2015

done ! tested with HazelCast, JacheRI and EHcache v3

@clun clun closed this as completed Nov 29, 2015
@ouaibsky
Copy link

ouaibsky commented Feb 4, 2016

Hi Cedric
Nice feature, it's just a shame to release a 1.3.* with this because it broke a lot of things (no more FeatureCacheManager)
Can you tell me up-to wich version this class still available ?

Thx
christophe

@clun
Copy link
Collaborator Author

clun commented Feb 4, 2016

Hello,

The FeatureCacheManager has been renamed to "FF4JCacheManager" in 1.3.4 because now you can toggle and edit feratures but also any kind of property (PropertyStore). I should have put it 1.4x at least you're right.

Please note that FeatureStore and CacheManager and 2 distinct thing. The first implements the CRUD mechanims and the second is a meant to be used as a proxy of the first. If you choose to work with a FeatureStore already based on distributed cache like HazelCast or Redis and you won't need FF4JCacheManager anymore.

PS for you : In the coming release I will also provide a "ff4j-store-eureka" in order to store configuration properties and feature states in a service registry.

@ouaibsky
Copy link

ouaibsky commented Mar 4, 2016

Hi
Nice, Thx you Cedric
For you information we put in place ff4j in my project based on microservices. it's just a start, and we plan to leverage more and more in the future
If you want a feedback, you know where we are ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants