allow unused wordlist in config file

[Hazegard]

This is an attempt to fix issue #572.

The current fix just print the error message to stderr instead of adding it to the Multierror defined.
I am open to better alternatives 😁

I also had to remove unused worldlist in the Config.InputProviders. Otherwise, unused wordlists are still considered as used (in the reports for instance).

[maa-x]

Thanks for the PR. Any ideas why this PR is being ignored? It would significantly improve my workflow when using ffuf.

[n3rada]

Is the maintainer consciously ignoring this Pull Request?

[bsysop]

Hi everyone,

@n3rada, "consciously ignoring" is not the most appropriate for Open Source tools :), Things in Open Source are done when possible and this will be reviewed as soon as possible.

@MaxIsMyName an option for you is building the code locally using Golang go build and running it with the PR.

[joohoi]

Hey! Yeah, I have been busy with work, family, other hobbies and bunch of stuff related and unrelated to infosec. I’m authoring and maintaining quite a few different projects, both open- and closed source and there’s a finite time at my disposal. This individual PR is currently on hold as I’m working on a new feature that integrates ffuf/pencode to the ffuf, and requires a more generic approach to making keywords / wordlists flexible.

…

On Mon 4. Sep 2023 at 20.59, bsysop ***@***.***> wrote: Hi everyone, @n3rada <https://github.com/n3rada>, "consciously ignoring" is not the most appropriate for Open Source tools :), Things in Open Source are done when possible and this will be reviewed as soon as possible. @MaxIsMyName <https://github.com/MaxIsMyName> an option for you is building the code locally using Golang go build and running it with the PR. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#652 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABH6DJPTRGLHIOLFBTJA5ZDXYYJJ7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAVE22ATU> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[n3rada]

Forgive me for the "conscientiousness". I meant that you may didn't want to implement it that way at all and therefore ignored the request.

Personally, I use ffuf in preference to other tools, so I can only respect your work and your choice of direction. I'm pleased to see that you're going to make these changes. Thank you for your promptness!

[joohoi]

I ended up merging the pencode feature, but didn't get to the point where the wordlists and keywords should be managed. That's going to be something for the future. So contrary to my previous message, I'm going to accept and merge this pull request so it makes it to the upcoming release. Thanks for the PR!