Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

.coafile:4-6: Resurrect InvalidLinkBear. Now it failed on... #668

Open
0pdd opened this issue Dec 11, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

.coafile:4-6: Resurrect InvalidLinkBear. Now it failed on... #668

0pdd opened this issue Dec 11, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
3 we can defer this issue. But it'll good to implement it 30 mins middle-sized issue. Usually a part of feature or a fix cleanup everything that do project stronger, flexible, reusable devops work with service options with code or with configs

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented Dec 11, 2018

The puzzle 665-cd32d089 from #665 has to be resolved:

shopelectro/.coafile

Lines 4 to 6 in 2cb4fa3

# @todo #665:30m Resurrect InvalidLinkBear.
# Now it failed on CI.
# https://ci.fidals.com/fidals/shopelectro/1108/11

The puzzle was created by duker33 on 11-Dec-18.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.
@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Dec 11, 2018

@artemiyds2 @duker33 please pay attention to this new issue.

0pdd referenced this issue Dec 11, 2018
@duker33
#656 Prove update_db pages consistency problems with test (#665)
2cb4fa3 
* #656  Prove update_db pages consistency problems with test

* #656  Apply linter rules

* #656  Remove reduntand comment

Co-Authored-By: duker33 <duker33@gmail.com>

* #656  Skip invalid links bear
@0pdd 0pdd mentioned this issue Dec 11, 2018
Merged
@duker33 duker33 added 30 mins middle-sized issue. Usually a part of feature or a fix 3 we can defer this issue. But it'll good to implement it take it any teammate can take this issue and start working with it cleanup everything that do project stronger, flexible, reusable labels Dec 11, 2018
@duker33 duker33 removed the take it any teammate can take this issue and start working with it label Nov 4, 2019
@duker33 duker33 assigned duker33 and olegush and unassigned duker33 and olegush Nov 4, 2019
@duker33 duker33 added the devops work with service options with code or with configs label Nov 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
3 we can defer this issue. But it'll good to implement it 30 mins middle-sized issue. Usually a part of feature or a fix cleanup everything that do project stronger, flexible, reusable devops work with service options with code or with configs
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@duker33 @0pdd @olegush