Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 18, 2024. It is now read-only.

[DataCap Application] Speedium - NexRad V2 [ Replica distribution ] Part 1 / 5 #483

Closed
cryptowhizzard opened this issue Jul 9, 2022 · 54 comments

Comments

@cryptowhizzard
Copy link

cryptowhizzard commented Jul 9, 2022

Large Dataset Notary Application

To apply for DataCap to onboard your dataset to Filecoin, please fill out the following.

Core Information

  • Organization Name: Speedium network
  • Website / Social Media: www.speedium.nl
  • Total amount of DataCap being requested (between 500 TiB and 5 PiB): 5 PiB
  • Weekly allocation of DataCap requested (usually between 1-100TiB): 1 PiB
  • On-chain address for first allocation: f1xafi3wsh7q553efnumhgeomathrehwwd2mye7oy

Please respond to the questions below by replacing the text saying "Please answer here". Include as much detail as you can in your answer.

Project details

Short addendum on this project

This application is a followup of our first. NexRad is 2 PiB +. We are building the dataset at the moment. This datacap is solely for replica distribution. Link -> https://github.com/filecoin-project/filecoin-plus-large-datasets/issues/340

Share a brief history of your project and organization.

Speedium / Dcent has engaged in Slingshot starting 2.6. We have successfully stored more than 15 differerent datasets with 20+ different miners.

What is the primary source of funding for this project?

Company account

What other projects/ecosystem stakeholders is this project associated with?

Slingshot competition hosted by Protocol Labs

Use-case details

Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin

The [Next Generation Weather Radar](https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/radar-data/nexrad) (NEXRAD) is a network of 160 high-resolution Doppler radar sites that detects precipitation and atmospheric movement and disseminates data in approximately 5 minute intervals from each site.

Where was the data in this dataset sourced from?

AWS

Can you share a sample of the data? A link to a file, an image, a table, etc., are good ways to do this.

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/radar-data/nexrad

Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network (i.e., no specific permissions or access rights are required to view the data).

Yes.

What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data?

Multiple times p/y

For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin?

18 months or longer

DataCap allocation plan

In which geographies (countries, regions) do you plan on making storage deals?

EU / US / Australia

How will you be distributing your data to storage providers? Is there an offline data transfer process?

The data will be transferred both offline and online.

How do you plan on choosing the storage providers with whom you will be making deals? This should include a plan to ensure the data is retrievable in the future both by you and others.

We have a few providers who have been working with us during Slingshot Restore program and we'd like to continue working with them for ongoing Slingshot competition.

How will you be distributing deals across storage providers?

Max 2 copy's per storage provider if stored on different miners / locations.

Do you have the resources/funding to start making deals as soon as you receive DataCap? What support from the community would help you onboard onto Filecoin?

Yes, we have the resources.
@large-datacap-requests
Copy link

Thanks for your request!
Everything looks good. 👌

A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.

@Sunnyiscoming
Copy link
Collaborator

@cryptowhizzard Hi,

  1. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/radar-data/nexrad, Page or Resource Not Found (404 Error)
  2. Please ensure that the total amount of DataCap being requested is 30 PiB. As you said, this datacap is solely for replica distribution, NexRad is 2 PiB +. It means you need more than 10 copies.
  3. Nexrad Dataset ( Speedium ) #340 The datacap being allocated has not be used(https://filplus.d.interplanetary.one/clients?filter=f1xafi3wsh7q553efnumhgeomathrehwwd2mye7oy). Maybe you should apply when you have used up the datacap you got in this issue.

@cryptowhizzard
Copy link
Author

Hi @Sunnyiscoming

Fair points.

1 -> https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-nexrad/

2 -> I am not sure if it is 2 PB exactly , this dataset is growing over the course of months. It can be that i won't apply for the last tranche.

3 -> This is rather difficult. I can't start sealing #340 solely with one miner by our own as this would violate the program rules. This is the reason i am doing this applications in parallel.

@Sunnyiscoming
Copy link
Collaborator

I don't quite understand your third point. Why can't datacap of #340 be allocated to other storage providers?

@cryptowhizzard
Copy link
Author

@Sunnyiscoming this can be done. But if i assign and they don't start in the same pace or rythm it will result in 1 provider taking the whole first allocation.

@Sunnyiscoming
Copy link
Collaborator

I will talk about this with governance team because I think it is a problem which can be solved.

@raghavrmadya
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Sunnyiscoming

Fair points.

1 -> https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-nexrad/

2 -> I am not sure if it is 2 PB exactly , this dataset is growing over the course of months. It can be that i won't apply for the last tranche.

3 -> This is rather difficult. I can't start sealing #340 solely with one miner by our own as this would violate the program rules. This is the reason i am doing this applications in parallel.

Hi @cryptowhizzard , can you elaborate on the difficulties? I'm unsure why you would only be able to seal with one SP?

@cryptowhizzard
Copy link
Author

@raghavrmadya because the dataset is the same size as the datacap. Only one can seal the first replica to get it on chain. This is no problem as i will do the replica’s in a separate LDN, i just want to give notification here.

@Sunnyiscoming
Copy link
Collaborator

If this problem can be solved. Maybe you can close this issue and continue #340

@raghavrmadya
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @cryptowhizzard, we have a PR open that was presented at the last gov call to increase the request limit to 25 PiBs. Do you mind waiting until end of this week when we merge that or are there SPs waiting on you?

@cryptowhizzard
Copy link
Author

Hi @raghavrmadya that is ok. I will also update the wallet address so it is a unique wallet address per datacap request.

@large-datacap-requests
Copy link

Thanks for your request!
Everything looks good. 👌

A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.

@large-datacap-requests
Copy link

Thanks for your request!
Everything looks good. 👌

A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.

@cryptowhizzard cryptowhizzard changed the title [DataCap Application] Speedium - NexRad V2 [ Replica distribution ] [DataCap Application] Speedium - NexRad V2 [ Replica distribution ] Part 1 Aug 15, 2022
@large-datacap-requests
Copy link

Thanks for your request!
Everything looks good. 👌

A Governance Team member will review the information provided and contact you back pretty soon.

@Kevin-FF-USA
Copy link
Collaborator

Datacap Request Trigger

Total DataCap requested

1 PiB

Expected weekly DataCap usage rate

400 TiB

Client address

f1xafi3wsh7q553efnumhgeomathrehwwd2mye7oy

@large-datacap-requests
Copy link

large-datacap-requests bot commented Jan 9, 2023

DataCap Allocation requested

Multisig Notary address

f02049625

Client address

f1xafi3wsh7q553efnumhgeomathrehwwd2mye7oy

DataCap allocation requested

256TiB

Id

feee3cd5-ac51-47fa-9810-cf45b5f1223a

@NiwanDao
Copy link

@cryptowhizzard The distribution looks healthy, but can you please explain the CID sharing with other entity #335 ?

@cryptowhizzard
Copy link
Author

@xingjitansuo

Yes i can. #335 and we did build exactly the same dataset from AWS S3. This means the same CID's will be created.

@NiwanDao
Copy link

The same CID only happens when the Data preparer uses the same way on the same raw data to prepare the car file.

@cryptowhizzard
Copy link
Author

cryptowhizzard commented Jan 11, 2023

@xingjitansuo yes , we did. We build it with Singularity, so did Xinan.

Copy link

Request Proposed

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been proposed by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzaceapnxsq4z54ed4fxvihz4bjuy2dhycfz4sdkqtolw4exp5x3hcyeu

Address

f1xafi3wsh7q553efnumhgeomathrehwwd2mye7oy

Datacap Allocated

256.00TiB

Signer Address

f1a2lia2cwwekeubwo4nppt4v4vebxs2frozarz3q

Id

feee3cd5-ac51-47fa-9810-cf45b5f1223a

You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzaceapnxsq4z54ed4fxvihz4bjuy2dhycfz4sdkqtolw4exp5x3hcyeu

@xinaxu
Copy link
Contributor

xinaxu commented Feb 10, 2023

checker:manualTrigger f1ws3n5tuxtyg26lraqkjirz7qon7y7ckju7hhmii f1pc5usvsbfgxxbq7c7quhhg6k7l6y5reiwqr3noy

@filplus-checker-app
Copy link

DataCap and CID Checker Report1

  • Organization: Speedium network
  • Client: f1xafi3wsh7q553efnumhgeomathrehwwd2mye7oy

Approvers

1flyworker
4kernelogic
1mjroddy
1Reiers
1s0nik42
1xinaxu
1xingjitansuo

Other Addresses2

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

If this is the first time a provider takes verified deal, it will be marked as new.

For most of the datacap application, below restrictions should apply.

  • Storage provider should not exceed 30% of total datacap.
  • Storage provider should not be storing duplicate data for more than 20%.
  • Storage provider should have published its public IP address.
  • All storage providers should be located in different regions.

⚠️ 26.75% of total deal sealed by f01208803 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 28.09% of total deal sealed by f01157271 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 24.21% of total deal sealed by f01208154 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 27.18% of total deal sealed by f01208632 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 50.24% of total deal sealed by f01208189 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 24.42% of total deal sealed by f01156835 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 34.04% of total deal sealed by f01208042 are duplicate data.

⚠️ 33.65% of total deal sealed by f01908671 are duplicate data.

Provider Location Total Deals Sealed Percentage Unique Data Duplicate Deals
f01919423 Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Andrew Sjoquist Enterprises Pty Ltd
813.30 TiB 5.35% 712.23 TiB 12.43%
f01938357 Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Andrew Sjoquist Enterprises Pty Ltd
538.78 TiB 3.54% 519.94 TiB 3.50%
f01864434 Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Andrew Sjoquist Enterprises Pty Ltd
206.53 TiB 1.36% 202.13 TiB 2.13%
f01208803 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
111.69 TiB 0.73% 81.81 TiB 26.75%
f01157271 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
103.81 TiB 0.68% 74.66 TiB 28.09%
f01208154 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
86.34 TiB 0.57% 65.44 TiB 24.21%
f01208632 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
77.84 TiB 0.51% 56.69 TiB 27.18%
f01208189 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
77.38 TiB 0.51% 38.50 TiB 50.24%
f01156835new Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
69.22 TiB 0.46% 52.31 TiB 24.42%
f01157249 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
56.19 TiB 0.37% 50.22 TiB 10.62%
f01156883 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
40.31 TiB 0.27% 38.22 TiB 5.19%
f01156538new Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
34.38 TiB 0.23% 28.19 TiB 18.00%
f01157027 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
31.34 TiB 0.21% 25.28 TiB 19.34%
f01156975 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
30.88 TiB 0.20% 25.78 TiB 16.50%
f01156901 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
28.13 TiB 0.18% 26.53 TiB 5.67%
f01157018 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
26.75 TiB 0.18% 23.34 TiB 12.73%
f01154023 Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Anycast Global Backbone
19.84 TiB 0.13% 18.63 TiB 6.14%
f01981059new Dallas, Texas, US
AT&T Services, Inc.
404.53 TiB 2.66% 404.53 TiB 0.00%
f022352 Oslo, Oslo, NO
Blix Solutions AS
17.25 TiB 0.11% 17.06 TiB 1.09%
f010479 Paris, Île-de-France, FR
CELESTE SAS
41.44 TiB 0.27% 37.34 TiB 9.88%
f01962819 Xi’an, Shaanxi, CN
China Telecom (Group)
97.16 TiB 0.64% 97.16 TiB 0.00%
f0750779new Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
CHINA UNICOM China169 Backbone
302.56 TiB 1.99% 301.94 TiB 0.21%
f01938665 Sham Shui Po, Sham Shui Po, HK
China Unicom Global
172.31 TiB 1.13% 170.25 TiB 1.20%
f039940 Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
CHINANET-BACKBONE
142.59 TiB 0.94% 142.41 TiB 0.13%
f01901765 Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
CHINANET-BACKBONE
90.91 TiB 0.60% 90.91 TiB 0.00%
f01902461new Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
CHINANET-BACKBONE
64.69 TiB 0.43% 64.69 TiB 0.00%
f01059489 Plano, Texas, US
Cogent Communications
243.66 TiB 1.60% 239.84 TiB 1.56%
f01996927new Plano, Texas, US
Cogent Communications
215.34 TiB 1.42% 215.34 TiB 0.00%
f02026730new Antwerpen, Flanders, BE
Cogent Communications
87.06 TiB 0.57% 86.47 TiB 0.68%
f01345523 Antwerpen, Flanders, BE
Cogent Communications
80.38 TiB 0.53% 80.06 TiB 0.39%
f01906874 Plano, Texas, US
Cogent Communications
63.09 TiB 0.41% 63.09 TiB 0.00%
f02012223 Antwerpen, Flanders, BE
Cogent Communications
24.84 TiB 0.16% 24.84 TiB 0.00%
f01858429 Boston, Massachusetts, US
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
65.59 TiB 0.43% 65.59 TiB 0.00%
f09848 Rancho Santa Margarita, California, US
Cox Communications Inc.
190.94 TiB 1.26% 190.25 TiB 0.36%
f01761579new Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
CT-HangZhou-IDC
380.69 TiB 2.50% 378.75 TiB 0.51%
f01207874 Sydney, New South Wales, AU
DATACOM SYSTEMS (AU) PTY LTD
62.69 TiB 0.41% 53.91 TiB 14.01%
f01208042 Sydney, New South Wales, AU
DATACOM SYSTEMS (AU) PTY LTD
56.38 TiB 0.37% 37.19 TiB 34.04%
f01207954 Sydney, New South Wales, AU
DATACOM SYSTEMS (AU) PTY LTD
45.97 TiB 0.30% 42.44 TiB 7.68%
f01206408 Sydney, New South Wales, AU
DATACOM SYSTEMS (AU) PTY LTD
22.13 TiB 0.15% 20.41 TiB 7.77%
f01971600 Dallas, Texas, US
Flexential Colorado Corp.
524.88 TiB 3.45% 524.88 TiB 0.00%
f01992630 Dallas, Texas, US
Flexential Colorado Corp.
524.28 TiB 3.45% 524.28 TiB 0.00%
f01920723 Maywood Park, Oregon, US
Flexential Colorado Corp.
414.94 TiB 2.73% 407.16 TiB 1.88%
f01988794 Dallas, Texas, US
Flexential Colorado Corp.
124.66 TiB 0.82% 124.66 TiB 0.00%
f01985775 Dallas, Texas, US
Flexential Colorado Corp.
100.58 TiB 0.66% 100.58 TiB 0.00%
f01985745 Dallas, Texas, US
Flexential Colorado Corp.
79.66 TiB 0.52% 79.66 TiB 0.00%
f01392893 Amsterdam, North Holland, NL
Fusix Networks B.V.
121.06 TiB 0.80% 121.06 TiB 0.00%
f01878201 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Hangzhou Alibaba Advertising Co.,Ltd.
98.84 TiB 0.65% 98.84 TiB 0.00%
f01911083 Tuusula, Uusimaa, FI
Hetzner Online GmbH
99.75 TiB 0.66% 99.75 TiB 0.00%
f01894158new Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK
HK Broadband Network Ltd.
204.34 TiB 1.34% 204.19 TiB 0.08%
f01907545 Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK
HK Broadband Network Ltd.
59.00 TiB 0.39% 59.00 TiB 0.00%
f01518369 San Jose, California, US
HONG KONG Megalayer Technology Co.,Limited
297.22 TiB 1.95% 297.22 TiB 0.00%
f01896422 Fremont, California, US
Hurricane Electric LLC
99.72 TiB 0.66% 99.72 TiB 0.00%
f01926686 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Jiangxi Jiujiang IDC
98.22 TiB 0.65% 98.22 TiB 0.00%
f01851482 Busan, Busan, KR
Korea Telecom
460.91 TiB 3.03% 460.91 TiB 0.00%
f01736668 Lincoln, Nebraska, US
LightEdge Solutions
143.63 TiB 0.94% 140.72 TiB 2.02%
f0855584new Lincoln, Nebraska, US
LightEdge Solutions
94.00 TiB 0.62% 90.94 TiB 3.26%
f01091851 Lincoln, Nebraska, US
LightEdge Solutions
30.41 TiB 0.20% 30.41 TiB 0.00%
f01908299 Lincoln, Nebraska, US
LightEdge Solutions
20.44 TiB 0.13% 20.38 TiB 0.31%
f01775922 Ashburn, Virginia, US
New Dream Network, LLC
24.72 TiB 0.16% 24.69 TiB 0.13%
f01652333 Sunnyvale, California, US
Packet Host, Inc.
351.38 TiB 2.31% 346.09 TiB 1.50%
f01662356 Ashburn, Virginia, US
Packet Host, Inc.
64.00 GiB 0.00% 64.00 GiB 0.00%
f01882184 Singapore, Singapore, SG
PCCW Global, Inc.
392.13 TiB 2.58% 392.13 TiB 0.00%
f01880047 Singapore, Singapore, SG
PCCW Global, Inc.
259.88 TiB 1.71% 259.88 TiB 0.00%
f01877571 Singapore, Singapore, SG
PCCW Global, Inc.
253.53 TiB 1.67% 253.38 TiB 0.06%
f01878005 Singapore, Singapore, SG
PCCW Global, Inc.
146.69 TiB 0.96% 146.19 TiB 0.34%
f01882177 Singapore, Singapore, SG
PCCW Global, Inc.
142.47 TiB 0.94% 142.41 TiB 0.04%
f01873432 Las Vegas, Nevada, US
PiKNiK & Company Inc.
332.09 TiB 2.18% 328.47 TiB 1.09%
f01851060new Las Vegas, Nevada, US
PiKNiK & Company Inc.
319.53 TiB 2.10% 314.16 TiB 1.68%
f01904630 Las Vegas, Nevada, US
PiKNiK & Company Inc.
140.31 TiB 0.92% 138.13 TiB 1.56%
f01419959 San Diego, California, US
ScaleMatrix
36.50 TiB 0.24% 35.53 TiB 2.65%
f01863339 Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Shenzhen Tencent Computer Systems Company Limited
70.22 TiB 0.46% 68.44 TiB 2.54%
f01852664 Singapore, Singapore, SG
StarHub Ltd
344.28 TiB 2.26% 344.28 TiB 0.00%
f01938717 Singapore, Singapore, SG
StarHub Ltd
164.16 TiB 1.08% 163.94 TiB 0.13%
f01850141 Hong Kong, Central and Western, HK
Tencent Building, Kejizhongyi Avenue
314.59 TiB 2.07% 313.19 TiB 0.45%
f01908671 Atlanta, Georgia, US
Unitas Global LLC
778.38 TiB 5.12% 516.47 TiB 33.65%
f01967501new Atlanta, Georgia, US
Unitas Global LLC
512.81 TiB 3.37% 512.81 TiB 0.00%
f01119939 Atlanta, Georgia, US
Unitas Global LLC
263.34 TiB 1.73% 260.94 TiB 0.91%
f01901739 Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Vocus Connect International Backbone
108.09 TiB 0.71% 95.31 TiB 11.82%
f01907460 Seattle, Washington, US
Wholesail networks LLC
591.44 TiB 3.89% 591.44 TiB 0.00%
f0838923 Seattle, Washington, US
Wholesail networks LLC
274.41 TiB 1.80% 271.19 TiB 1.17%
f01851231 Seattle, Washington, US
Wholesail networks LLC
21.25 TiB 0.14% 21.25 TiB 0.00%
f01720359 Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL
Wijnand Schouten trading as Speedium
230.00 TiB 1.51% 224.34 TiB 2.46%
f01786387 Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL
Wijnand Schouten trading as Speedium
138.41 TiB 0.91% 134.81 TiB 2.60%
f01771403 Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL
Wijnand Schouten trading as Speedium
124.56 TiB 0.82% 116.69 TiB 6.32%
f01199430 Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL
Wijnand Schouten trading as Speedium
27.09 TiB 0.18% 24.44 TiB 9.80%
f01937642new Heerhugowaard, North Holland, NL
Wijnand Schouten trading as Speedium
26.66 TiB 0.18% 26.00 TiB 2.46%

Provider Distribution

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

  • No more than 30% of unique data are stored with less than 4 providers.

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Unique Data Size Total Deals Made Number of Providers Deal Percentage
594.66 TiB 594.69 TiB 1 3.91%
19.55 TiB 39.91 TiB 2 0.26%
64.38 TiB 199.78 TiB 3 1.31%
147.56 TiB 608.81 TiB 4 4.00%
183.44 TiB 958.63 TiB 5 6.30%
126.88 TiB 788.31 TiB 6 5.18%
105.19 TiB 758.69 TiB 7 4.99%
58.25 TiB 484.47 TiB 8 3.19%
42.47 TiB 395.31 TiB 9 2.60%
24.41 TiB 260.22 TiB 10 1.71%
21.59 TiB 258.91 TiB 11 1.70%
20.03 TiB 260.25 TiB 12 1.71%
24.28 TiB 338.50 TiB 13 2.23%
29.75 TiB 450.16 TiB 14 2.96%
42.13 TiB 664.09 TiB 15 4.37%
36.75 TiB 621.25 TiB 16 4.08%
34.38 TiB 621.19 TiB 17 4.08%
31.97 TiB 608.72 TiB 18 4.00%
17.38 TiB 361.06 TiB 19 2.37%
14.78 TiB 321.44 TiB 20 2.11%
17.31 TiB 388.09 TiB 21 2.55%
20.03 TiB 461.72 TiB 22 3.04%
23.63 TiB 568.78 TiB 23 3.74%
24.53 TiB 612.59 TiB 24 4.03%
24.38 TiB 635.03 TiB 25 4.17%
25.53 TiB 690.78 TiB 26 4.54%
22.88 TiB 642.97 TiB 27 4.23%
17.75 TiB 518.28 TiB 28 3.41%
12.63 TiB 381.38 TiB 29 2.51%
10.94 TiB 342.69 TiB 30 2.25%
6.97 TiB 227.19 TiB 31 1.49%
3.00 TiB 100.53 TiB 32 0.66%
1.22 TiB 42.47 TiB 33 0.28%
96.00 GiB 3.50 TiB 34 0.02%

Replication Distribution

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients.
Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.3

⚠️ CID sharing has been observed.

Other Client Application Total Deals Affected Unique CIDs Approvers
f1z7jogzx4x42wtilzb4lu6iotlad5rptt2acbzpi Speedium network 235.94 TiB 3,212 1flyworker
1kernelogic
4MegTei
2psh0691
3Reiers
3s0nik42
f17ia7m5mvizrdug3sqtevqw3tifiqvxqr3kdaeuq Speedium NetworkSpeedium Network 832.00 GiB 9 2dannyob
3flyworker
4MegTei
3Reiers
6s0nik42
f1klrehuwhzfw6boiiywdi7pikztsob4kkieivcwq InternationalGenome (EMBL-EBI) 480.00 GiB 2 1kernelogic
1mjroddy
1psh0691
1s0nik42
1xinaxu
1xingjitansuo

Footnotes

  1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger

  2. Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger

  3. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...

@github-actions
Copy link

This application has not seen any responses in the last 10 days. This issue will be marked with Stale label and will be closed in 4 days. Comment if you want to keep this application open.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jul 21, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This application has not seen any responses in the last 14 days, so for now it is being closed. Please feel free to contact the Fil+ Gov team to re-open the application if it is still being processed. Thank you!

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 27, 2023
@data-programs data-programs added the kyc verified User has passed KYC check label Aug 22, 2023
@data-programs
Copy link
Collaborator

KYC

This user’s identity has been verified through filplus.storage

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

16 participants