Scribus upgrade

[nieder]

Updates scribus to latest 1.4.6
Fixes to build as x86_64 so that it can link to our libraries as expected

[nieder]

Emailed Martin Costabel so he knows about it and we can get his github handle.

[dmacks]

It's been 1.5 years...time to get'erdone if Martin is AWOL? Upstream is now up to 1.4.8 and fink now has boost1.68. Is hardcoded /opt/X11 correct for x11 on all currently-supported distros or should CompileScript determine it on-the-fly?

[nieder]

/opt/X11 is correct from 10.9 and up. Could use buildenv-modules, but not necessary when it's just a single settings that's currently fixed.

[dmacks]

Confirmed -x11 buildable on 10.13, so we should get this in soon (existing has deps on a boost that doesn't even exist in most dists). I instrumented the build with:

       -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-MD" \
       -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-MD" \

and fink-package-precedence and otool-L on the binaries indicate that expat1, fontconfig2, and glib2 are not needed, but that libhunspell1.6-dev/-shlibs is a missing dep.

Edit: fontconfig2-shlibs is not linked but the -dev is used at build-time

Given this thing links fink's python27, should it be using the -python27 variant of boost rather than -systempython?

[dmacks]

-aqua variant is good too (same dep comments as for -x11). However, regarding boost... it's only build-time not runtime, so I don't know if it matters what python the boost claims to match. The -aqua package does not use appear to use fink's python27, so using boost -systempython keeps fink's python out of the whole dep-tree. I really don't care, just am tired of seeing dep-tree holes and FTBFS.

[dmacks]

lgtm

[costabel]

On 7/01/21 17:12, Daniel Macks wrote: lgtm

I admire your heroic efforts to keep this old stuff alive. But I haven't touched it in 5 years and won't ever touch it again. I don't see much sense in keeping a Fink scribus package, and I can't believe anyone still uses it. Same goes for texmacs if it is still around.

…

-- Martin

[nieder]

I'll go ahead and unmaintain you from both packages.

[costabel]

On 8/01/21 10:54, nieder wrote: I'll go ahead and unmaintain you from both packages. — You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#125 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI3E6Q6LC7AJEDLYFKGRPLSY3I5FANCNFSM4EZLRSOA>.

Thanks

…

-- Martin