FR: Crashlytics firebase #710
Comments
|
Any news on this? It's would be really helpful if we had crashlytics for the web applications now that we have performance monitoring supported. |
|
Seems like Crashlytics is now the only GA Firebase product not supported for web... |
|
Yeah... It's really missing piece of the puzzle. Hope it will be considered in near future :) |
|
Maybe this can be integrated into firebase-performance? https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/stackdriver-errors-js |
|
any updates on that? |
|
@dzienisz I would just relax and wait until end of March they are currently rebuilding the Crashlytics SDK as the current one was built for Fabric (Crashlytics was a product of Fabric). And maybe this will enable them to also support Crashlytics for Web. |
|
Haven't seen anything about the web in their new rebuild. |
|
+1 |
1 similar comment
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
1 similar comment
|
+1 |
|
I’m building a template for ES module Firebase apps. Fully agree with @netstart ’s original text that this should/could be within the Firebase umbrella. |
|
I was hoping to use Crashlytics for a react-native & expo mobile app without ever having to touch any android/iOS-specific code. |
|
+1 |
Why can't you just mark exiting comment with a reaction and instead you put meaningless notification in dozens of mailboxes??? |
|
While various hacks exist we're still hanging out for this important feature. |
|
Any updates? |
|
still no updates? Or any ETA? |
|
In my case I ended up using google's stackdrive which allows to keep track of errors and manage them. Its free and it's still from google. You can check how to set it up in this stackoverflow answer. Works well so far while we are waiting for crashlytics support. |
Nope. A/B Testing, Predictions and In-App messaging are still not supported for the web. |
|
|
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
|
@akauppi Sentry is Sentry and firebase is firebase. Current issue about firebase. |
|
@akauppi Thank you for your suggestion. But sometimes you can't decide which library/service to use in your app as you are not the CTO/Team Lead. |
|
There is another alternative for the time being - Stackdrive, which is also
google's product.
Here is a post on how to use it:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/65500440/1713920
…On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 7:52 AM Tigran Galstyan ***@***.***> wrote:
@akauppi <https://github.com/akauppi> Thank you for your suggestion. But
sometimes you can't decide which library/service to use in your app as you
are not the CTO/Team Lead.
By the way firebase works great for mobile and I think running it on the
web is not enough reason to change to Sentry and do refactoring.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#710 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB6EXKTB6YZEV4VFWTWTME3VW5QZFANCNFSM4E3WDGUQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
I wanna use Firebase Crashlytics for my app, nothing else. That's the only thing I know of that provides detailed and nice crash reports. Also, the Crashlytics SDK may have a small bundle size. |
|
In a total perspective Firebase Crashlytics should focus on web-support, especieally when there isn't any emphasize on those pages that Crashlytics isn't supported for Flutter Web (and other web based systems), when it is supported for iOS, android. If it is supported for Flutter Web (lately ?), please let is know. Page ref: https://pub.dev/packages/firebase_crashlytics : emphasizes that there is no web support!! |
|
I totally agree with you. I'd love to have Firebase Crashlytics bring support to the web as well, especially because we're already using some other Firebase products, and don't want to continue adding more third-party providers to our projects, if it's not needed. |
|
Reading about the latest cool Crashlytics feature feels kinda like another Firebase "let down" if you're a web dev. Seems like the Crashlytics devs have a "don't bother us" attitude to the web SDK. Seriously how hard can it be? It would seem like most of the stack is in place. |
|
While I'm looking forward to having crashlytics, I don't think whining
would do much to help.
If you need to track crashes, use Stackdrive for the time being - there is
nothing to integrate, just enable it in your google account and you'll get
crash reports. If you use standard "console.error" logs that's it, you
don't even need to change your code at all.
If Stackdrive is not an option, then just wait.
Or you can become an employee of the Crashlytics team and implement it.
Everyone else here would be grateful.
Other than that, comments with the whine attitude don't really add anything
to the conversation, so please stop posting them.
…On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 1:45 PM Tony OHagan ***@***.***> wrote:
Reading about the latest cool Crashlytics feature feels kinda like another
Firebase "let down" if you're a web dev. Seems like the Crashlytics devs
have a "don't bother us" attitude to the web SDK. Seriously how hard can it
be? It would seem like most of the stack is in place.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#710 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB6EXKXENZCQ4JMJSZFQDATWAQVULANCNFSM4E3WDGUQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Speaking for the JS SDK team, we would be happy to add Crashlytics to web and we know the high demand for it. A lot of moving parts need to come together to make that happen, so we can't guarantee anything. But feature request issues like this are very important for demonstrating demand and getting those moving parts to start moving, etc, so if this is important to you, absolutely thumbs up the original post. And if you have any interesting use cases or reasons why it's important to you, or other Google/Firebase products you would use more of if Crashlytics was available, please feel free to add comments about it. Also welcome are what are the most important features or requirements of a Crashlytics Web SDK? It will necessarily be different from mobile crashlytics as the definition of crashes and errors aren't perfectly parallel between mobile and web platforms. Or if there are other existing products out there that you like and you want us to match. |
|
Interested particularly in Crashlytics for Flutter. Would love to the get the Dart stack trace in error reports. |
For a Flutter app I don't see any differences between the definition of mobile/Web crashes and errors. My Flutter app is available for Android, iOS and Web (+PWA app). I have added Sentry to my Web app, but I don't really use it because decrypting minified stack traces seems to require uploading my source codes to Sentry backend which I don't want to do. Also adding another service like Sentry to my app is just extra work and extra risk regarding e.g. privacy policy. So currently my Flutter app for Web is without functional error reporting. I fix issues I see from Android/iOS Crashlytics and trust that it is good enough also for Web for now. I am not that familiar with other Web development tools, but I believe Flutter/Web developers in particular miss Crashlytics for Web a lot. |
Our Flutter Web app could really use Crashlytics. Web is our primary deployment target, and occasionally Web has exceptions and issues that are not present on mobile, especially with federated plugin packages that have different implementation across platforms. Tracking web OAuth flows for exceptions in production, for example, is virtually impossible right now. We are currently using Sentry instead of Crashlytics because of the multi-platform support - however, while Sentry allows us to see that flutter web exceptions are happening, there is a source map code minification issue flutter/flutter#87734 (comment) that prevents accurate reporting of which part of the code is causing the exception. |
|
Any update on here - been waiting patiently for years.... |
|
Very much needed... UPDATE: We moved to Sentry due to this. |
|
Welcome to 2023, still waiting UPDATE: Even if the Firebase Team want to implement this, it'll take a long time until it gets as advanced as Sentry. |
And the wait will continue. It seems that it will not be taken into account. |
|
Its fun that looks like we'll close this year without any update on this lol |
|
Sentry is actually really good lol just use it, don't worry about waiting |
|
+1 |
|
I found i can just activate Google Error Reporting, create a simple firebase function that accepts and logs an Error object and call it from my web apps. By sending an Error object from the client, you ensure the client side stack is captured so the Error Reporting system can aggregate similar errors and allow you to manage and track resolutions. https://cloud.google.com/error-reporting I had a look at the client side library that Sentry add into your web app and while I'm sure it boasts some powerful features my conclusion was that in addition to $/month Sentry adds a large client side library that will likely impact app load times and TTI. |
and others
Please, support crashlytics firebase.
I do not want to use other services, like https://www.bugsnag.com/report crash in my web app writed in Angular
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: