Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implemented snapshot loading capabilities #414
Implemented snapshot loading capabilities #414
Changes from all commits
27af710
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We switched from
ptp
tobridge
in firecracker-containerd. Should we do the same here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked into this and it didn't work out-of-the-box. Mainly I didn't see the bridge plugin creating the IP route on the host like the ptp plugin does. So packets were not being routed to the bridge. More than likely I am miss configuring though. @sondavidb would you like to give it a shot?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From what I understand, the bridge plugin doesn't actually create any network interfaces, it only bridges two pre-existing connections. So, to refactor this would probably take moderate effort — entirely doable, but I would also like to finish this PR first to get the feature out, and then create a separate PR to refactor this. Given that it's only used in a test, I think it's not crucial to ship this change with the existing PR. What do you think @Kern--?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both the bridge plugin and ptp create veth pairs, so it should be just a slightly different config to switch, but I don't feel strongly enough about which we use to block on that. It's fine to ship this as is.